Re: ath79: Fix for Mikrotik NAND bad blocks - testers needed

2021-03-22 Thread W. Michael Petullo
> So now I'm looking for testers (and reviewers) who could test this change on > the affected devices (with bad blocks) and NOR Mikrotiks. Also, a word from > OpenWrt maintainers if this is the acceptable approach - there is not much > choice, alternatives would be include porting U-Boot, a task wi

Re: [PATCH] mwlwifi: remove target dependency

2021-03-22 Thread Paul Spooren
On Di, Mär 23, 2021 at 00:17, Daniel Golle wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 3/21/21 10:17 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > Users complained that building images for various mvebu Linksys devices > fails when using the ImageBuilder, it complains about t

Re: [PATCH] mwlwifi: remove target dependency

2021-03-22 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 3/21/21 10:17 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > > Users complained that building images for various mvebu Linksys devices > > fails when using the ImageBuilder, it complains about the package > > 'mwlwifi-firmware-88w8964' not being found

Re: [PATCH] mwlwifi: remove target dependency

2021-03-22 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 3/21/21 10:17 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: Users complained that building images for various mvebu Linksys devices fails when using the ImageBuilder, it complains about the package 'mwlwifi-firmware-88w8964' not being found. Turns out the package builds fine in mvebu/cortex-a9 images build, but is

ath79: Fix for Mikrotik NAND bad blocks - testers needed

2021-03-22 Thread Danijel
Hi, I'm working on restoring Mikrotik RB2011 support after ar71xx target was dropped after 19.07 release. While working on it, the problem with bad blocks and the issue of the current way of flashing kernel was also brought up. Right now, for Mikrotiks we use kernel2minor which generates a 4MiB YA

Re: [PATCH] procd: Adding support to detect Pantavisor Container Platform

2021-03-22 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:09:03PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:53:35AM +, Daniel Golle wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:00:06PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:42:25AM +, Daniel Golle wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:38

Re: [PATCH] mwlwifi: remove target dependency

2021-03-22 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:22:25PM +, Imre Kaloz wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > FWIW in my opinion we should get back to this topic as soon as you have a > mwlwifi supported card up and running on any other platform. Right now this > would introduce a change just to make a different platform's SDK

Re: [PATCH] procd: Adding support to detect Pantavisor Container Platform

2021-03-22 Thread Gaurav Pathak
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:53:35AM +, Daniel Golle wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:00:06PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:42:25AM +, Daniel Golle wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:38:25PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > > > > > I assume that if th

Re: [PATCH] mwlwifi: remove target dependency

2021-03-22 Thread Imre Kaloz
Hi Daniel, FWIW in my opinion we should get back to this topic as soon as you have a mwlwifi supported card up and running on any other platform. Right now this would introduce a change just to make a different platform's SDK usable for a purpose which would get a straight "no" from the develop

Re: [PATCH] build: artifacts add dependency for builded images

2021-03-22 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:44:47PM +0200, Oskari Lemmelä wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.3.2021 11.55, Paul Spooren wrote: > > On Sat Mar 20, 2021 at 10:58 PM HST, Oskari Lemmela wrote: > > > Add possibility to use images and initramfs in artifacts. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oskari Lemmela > > > --- > >

Re: [PATCH] build: artifacts add dependency for builded images

2021-03-22 Thread Oskari Lemmelä
Hi, On 21.3.2021 11.55, Paul Spooren wrote: On Sat Mar 20, 2021 at 10:58 PM HST, Oskari Lemmela wrote: Add possibility to use images and initramfs in artifacts. Signed-off-by: Oskari Lemmela --- Hi, could you please elaborate on your use-case? One use case is build full sdcard image for Ba

Re: [PATCH] procd: Adding support to detect Pantavisor Container Platform

2021-03-22 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:00:06PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:42:25AM +, Daniel Golle wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:38:25PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > > > > I assume that if this is a custom downstream version then the change > > > is > > > > not a

Re: [PATCH] procd: Adding support to detect Pantavisor Container Platform

2021-03-22 Thread Gaurav Pathak
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:42:25AM +, Daniel Golle wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:38:25PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > I missed your message, seems like it didn't land in inbox or spam folder of > > my e-mail. > > > > > as it runs a custom modified version > > > of

Re: [PATCH] procd: Adding support to detect Pantavisor Container Platform

2021-03-22 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:38:25PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote: > Hi John, > > I missed your message, seems like it didn't land in inbox or spam folder of > my e-mail. > > > as it runs a custom modified version > > of LXC > > > I assume that if this is a custom downstream version then th

[PATCH] procd: Adding support to detect Pantavisor Container Platform

2021-03-22 Thread Gaurav Pathak
Hi John, I missed your message, seems like it didn't land in inbox or spam folder of my e-mail. > as it runs a custom modified version > of LXC > I assume that if this is a custom downstream version then the change is > not applicable for merge into upstream owrt. please exp