On 15-11-20, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> There are two solutions to fix/workaround the problem:
>
> 1) randomize ICMP rate limiting (done in upstream kernel, there are
>already OpenWrt patches to update it)
I just checked, here are stable kernel versions containing the fix:
- 4.9.241
- 4.14.20
Hi,
There is a new generic cache poisoning attack for DNS: https://www.saddns.net/
It's a bit tricky, but the general idea is that an attacker can guess
the ephemeral port used by a DNS resolver make a DNS query (that's
dnsmasq in our case). The attacker then "just" has to guess the
transaction
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
You can flash via tftp recovery:
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
This is required for LTE module MR
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
This is required for LTE module MR
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
There already was an option for au
No special changes, just get in sync with recent code.
See here for the changelog:
https://valgrind.org/docs/manual/dist.news.html
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
---
package/devel/valgrind/Makefile | 6 +++---
.../devel/valgrind/patches/100-fix_configure_check.patch
No special changes, just get in sync with recent code.
See here for the changelog:
https://github.com/strace/strace/releases/tag/v5.9
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
---
package/devel/strace/Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/devel/strace/Makef
No special changes, just get in sync with recent code.
See here for the changelog:
http://software.es.net/iperf/news.html#iperf-3-9-released
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
---
package/network/utils/iperf3/Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/net
On 11/11/20 12:38 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
OpenWrt supports this year's "Wireless Battle of the Mesh - Virtual
Global Edition".
The event aims to virtually bring together people from across the globe
who are interested in community networks, including wireless mesh
network technologies, fibe
Update dropbear to latest stable 2.81; for the changes see
https://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/CHANGES
Refresh patches
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker
---
package/network/services/dropbear/Makefile | 6 +++---
.../network/services/dropbear/patches/110-change_user.patch | 2 +-
.../s
Hi,
> Are there any real blockers left?
LuCI support for bridge-vlan config is unmerged/unpolished yet.
I'd rather not ship 20.x without functioning switch config support in
the ui.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
open
On 2020-11-14 09:58, Hannu Nyman wrote:
Looks like the download server is down, or at least has major trouble (with the
backend?).
There are several forum discussions about errors like
504 Gateway Time-out
502 Bad Gateway
https://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/
Had the same issue but it
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Hannu Nyman
> Sent: Samstag, 14. November 2020 10:08
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: RE: Upcoming 19.07.4 and 18.07.9 stable releases
>
> I wonder why there seems
Hannu Nyman writes:
> I wonder why there seems to be practically no discussion about
> preparations for the 20.0x release (or actually 20.1x now...).
>
> I think that last time it was mentioned in August:
>
> http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2020-August/001639.html
>
>
> Is there an
I wonder why there seems to be practically no discussion about preparations
for the 20.0x release (or actually 20.1x now...).
I think that last time it was mentioned in August:
http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2020-August/001639.html
Is there any hope for a release, or will 2020
Looks like the download server is down, or at least has major trouble (with
the backend?).
There are several forum discussions about errors like
504 Gateway Time-out
502 Bad Gateway
https://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/
___
openwrt-devel maili
17 matches
Mail list logo
