RE: [PATCH 2/2] mvebu: LS421DE: improve the HDD leds

2020-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Daniel González Cabanelas > Sent: Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 00:20 > To: Adrian Schmutzler > Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mvebu: LS421DE: imp

Re: CandelaTech downloads broken for 18.06.8 QCA4019 ath10k-firmware?

2020-11-11 Thread Daniel Bailey
Good news! The zeroed out https://www.candelatech.com/downloads/ath10k-4019-10-4/firmware-5-ct-full-community-11.bin-lede.001 has been restored as of this morning. That aside, does anybody have any ideas about how to handle the issue with the mirrors not having the same file name and download path

[PATCH] tools: sstrip: update to latest version

2020-11-11 Thread Rui Salvaterra
Drop our local sstrip copy and use the current ELFKickers upstream version. Patch the original makefile in order to avoid building elftoc, since it fails with musl's elf.h. This is fine, since we only need sstrip anyway. Finally, add the possibility to pass additional arguments to sstrip (-z being

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mvebu: LS421DE: improve the HDD leds

2020-11-11 Thread Daniel González Cabanelas
Hi Adrian, El mié., 11 nov. 2020 a las 23:50, Adrian Schmutzler () escribió: > > Hi, > > > -Original Message- > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > > On Behalf Of Daniel González Cabanelas > > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. November 2020 23:25 > > To: openwrt-deve

RE: [PATCH] Adds support for Comfast CF-E538AC

2020-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi Sven, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Sven Danner > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. November 2020 06:05 > To: j...@phrozen.org > Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: [PATCH] Adds support for Comfast CF-E538AC > >

RE: [PATCH 2/2] mvebu: LS421DE: improve the HDD leds

2020-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Daniel González Cabanelas > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. November 2020 23:25 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mvebu: LS421DE: improve the HDD leds > > Improve

[PATCH 1/2] mvebu: LS421DE: fix low performance issue

2020-11-11 Thread Daniel González Cabanelas
The Buffallo Linkstation LS421DE isn't able to enable the Level 2 cache (AKA Aurora cache). As of result of this, the performance is about the half as expected, e.g when doing network data transfers. Fix it by adding the broken-idle property in the coherency fabric node. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gon

[PATCH 2/2] mvebu: LS421DE: improve the HDD leds

2020-11-11 Thread Daniel González Cabanelas
Improve the HDD LEDs used for disk activity: - Use the labels of the casing for better identification - Use the trigger activity per ata channel Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas --- .../arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-buffalo-ls421de.dts | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+),

R: R: Someone working on kernel 5.9?

2020-11-11 Thread ansuelsmth
> ansuels...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > > If you want I can port 5.9 to ipq806x and check if there is any > > > > problem. That way it will be ready when 5.10 is released (i think > > > > minimal change from 5.9 to 5.10) > > > tsense patches not apply, ar8216 driver need smal

Re: R: Someone working on kernel 5.9?

2020-11-11 Thread Andrey Jr. Melnikov
ansuels...@gmail.com wrote: > > Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > If you want I can port 5.9 to ipq806x and check if there is any > > > problem. That way it will be ready when 5.10 is released (i think > > > minimal change from 5.9 to 5.10) > > tsense patches not apply, ar8216 driver need small fix: > >

Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: 'ipset' config sections

2020-11-11 Thread Aleksandr Mezin
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:50 AM Hans Dedecker wrote: > Nothing wrong the patch as it looks fine; it just takes some time > before somebody finds time to review and test a patch. > I just applied the patch to master; thx Thank you. A few months ago, I tried to send the same patch as a pull request

Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: 'ipset' config sections

2020-11-11 Thread Hans Dedecker
Hi, On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:55 AM Aleksandr Mezin wrote: > > Is something wrong with this patch? Should I CC someone to get the > patch reviewed? I'm unable to figure out who is the maintainer of > dnsmasq package Nothing wrong the patch as it looks fine; it just takes some time before somebody

Re: [PATCH] rpcd: Add support for plugin command input via argv[3] ($3)

2020-11-11 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, the request payload can theoretically become very big, something in the few hundred kilobyte to one megabyte ballpark. I am not sure if it is a good idea to pass that via the argv vector. ~ Jo ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.open

[PATCH] rpcd: Add support for plugin command input via argv[3] ($3)

2020-11-11 Thread Louis_Hampton
This does not disable the current method of using plugin command arguments (stdin), only adding the new feature. Signed-off-by: Louis Hampton --- plugin.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/plugin.c b/plugin.c index b0315dc..f12b212 100644 --- a/plugin.c +++ b/plugin.c @@ -229,6

Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] sysupgrade: reword and organize log lines

2020-11-11 Thread Yousong Zhou
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 21:46, Yousong Zhou wrote: > > The series mainly aims to make sysupgrade log output more organized and > less disturbing, in the following aspects > > - Hide "write error: Broken pipe" from cat command and its friends > - Hide "F+P records in/out" lines from dd command >

RE: Upcoming 19.07.4 and 18.07.9 stable releases

2020-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
> -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Baptiste Jonglez > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. November 2020 13:15 > To: Hauke Mehrtens > Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thomas Endt > Subject: Re: Upcoming 19.07.4 and 18.07.9 stable

R: Someone working on kernel 5.9?

2020-11-11 Thread ansuelsmth
> Ansuel Smith wrote: > > If you want I can port 5.9 to ipq806x and check if there is any > > problem. That way it will be ready when 5.10 is released (i think > > minimal change from 5.9 to 5.10) > tsense patches not apply, ar8216 driver need small fix: > I think that with 5.10 we will be able

Re: Upcoming 19.07.4 and 18.07.9 stable releases

2020-11-11 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
On 11-11-20, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Hi, > > Currently 18.06 looks good for me and I would really like to do the final > release and call it then officially end of life. > > I would wait for the build bot results and then do it at the weekend. Yes, I fully agree, it's ready. Looking at buildbot

Re: Upcoming 19.07.4 and 18.07.9 stable releases

2020-11-11 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 11/11/20 1:17 AM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: I would wait for the build bot results and then do it at the weekend. Should we also do an other 19.07 release now? "ath79: ar8216: make switch register access atomic" could be a big deal for ath79 users, and several ramips users might be happy ab

Re: Someone working on kernel 5.9?

2020-11-11 Thread Andrey Jr. Melnikov
Ansuel Smith wrote: > If you want I can port 5.9 to ipq806x and check if there is any > problem. That way it will be ready when 5.10 is released (i think > minimal change from 5.9 to 5.10) tsense patches not apply, ar8216 driver need small fix: diff --git a/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/