May 22, 2020 17:37:38 Alexander Couzens :
Hi,
why? = missing commit description
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
> ---
> toolchain/musl/common.mk | 9 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/toolchain/musl/common.mk b/toolchain/musl/common.mk
> index e1354f
Hey Alex
> I have been trying to add support for the Quectel EM20-G LTE modem on
> openwrt, using a similar method to how the support for the RM500Q modem
> was implemented. I made changes to the qmi_wwan driver using the
> attached patch (which also has backported changes for the RM500Q).
>
Not
> On May 20, 2020, at 6:49 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Rosen Penev [2020-04-05 19:02:51]:
>
> Missing commit description and BTW to me this looks like another candidate for
> move into packages feed.
I sent a different patch doing just that.
>
> -- ynezz
___
Does not seem to be needed here. This will be imported into packages.
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev
---
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/12256
package/utils/xfsprogs/Makefile | 98 ---
.../xfsprogs/patches/100-no-selftest.patch| 14 ---
.../utils/xfsprogs/
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:16 PM Rosen Penev wrote:
>
> No package in base uses libconfig. Everything is in the packages feed.
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/12255
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev
> ---
> package/libs/libconfig/Makefile | 60 -
> 1 file cha
No package in base uses libconfig. Everything is in the packages feed.
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev
---
package/libs/libconfig/Makefile | 60 -
1 file changed, 60 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 package/libs/libconfig/Makefile
diff --git a/package/libs/libconfig/M
I have been working with the LS1088ARDB and have found some issues with
the default firmware image. Only one network interface is set up on boot
and the documentation to get them all up and working is sparse. I have
figured out how to get all of this set up and was wondering how i could
contrib
Tested-by: Olli Asikainen [WS-WR512N1]
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I bisected this earlier and the commit that breaks USB enumeration is
fddc78bc116bc043fb5cd92dbc45cfd054c21af8, which bumps the kernel
version from 4.4.74 to 4.9.34.
Unlike with 4.4.74, the device is reset on driver probe:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drive
Just to have it documented it somewhere:
On 5/21/20 9:56 AM, David Bauer wrote:
> Expose the WEP support to LuCi or other userspace tools using the
LuCi seems to already make some wrong assumptions about prerequisites
for specific encryption techniques. It assumes WEP as well as open APs
are supp
Hello Adrian,
On 5/21/20 8:30 PM, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> "device" would have been my alternative choice. However, for me "device"
> implies the full name (including vendor) even more.
> In contrast, for me model implies that the vendor is not included (like we
> use in for DEVICE_MODE
Hi Jeff,
I am using the latest openwrt trunk. I compiled it on the latest Ubuntu
20.04 x86_64.
Today i did a checkout of the latest openwrt trunk en recompiled it again.
When compiling openwrt for Raspberri PI3 i only selected package golang.
With as result the same compile error:
Perry
go
Tested-by: Olli Asikainen [WS-WR512N1]
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:19 PM wrote:
> > Sure. I am a bit new to this, is there something I need to do?
>
> Just answer to this mail with "Tested-by: Full Name [your
> device]" in a separate line, and it will be added to the patch
> automatically if som
> Sure. I am a bit new to this, is there something I need to do?
Just answer to this mail with "Tested-by: Full Name [your
device]" in a separate line, and it will be added to the patch automatically if
somebody pulls it from patchwork.
Best
Adrian
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
this starts with some nitpicks, and becomes more important closer to the end:
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Segers
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Mai 2020 19:48
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: [O
Sure. I am a bit new to this, is there something I need to do?
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 8:59 PM wrote:
> > I can confirm that this change to awake-rt305x-dwc2-controller.patch
> fixes the USB hub initialization on WS-WR512N1. USB enumeration works
> properly after removing 0032-USB-dwc2-add-dev
> I can confirm that this change to awake-rt305x-dwc2-controller.patch fixes
> the USB hub initialization on WS-WR512N1. USB enumeration works properly
> after removing 0032-USB-dwc2-add-device_reset.patch, too.
So, can you provide a Tested-by?
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP s
The Netgear WNDR4300 SW is identical to the regular WNDR4300 and only
differs by its BOARD_ID.
Resulting image has been confirmed working [1].
Because of the minor difference with the regular model I am unsure about
the approach, so please let me know if this overdoes it (and what I
should change
I can confirm that this change to awake-rt305x-dwc2-controller.patch fixes
the USB hub initialization on WS-WR512N1. USB enumeration works properly
after removing 0032-USB-dwc2-add-device_reset.patch, too.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@list
The Netgear WNDR4300 SW is identical to the regular WNDR4300 SW and only
differs by its BOARD_ID.
Resulting image has been confirmed working [1].
Because of the minor difference with the regular model I am unsure about
the approach, so please let me know if this overdoes it (and what I
should cha
Hi again,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthias Schiffer
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2020 20:14
> To: Adrian Schmutzler
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide: use
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
---
toolchain/musl/common.mk | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/toolchain/musl/common.mk b/toolchain/musl/common.mk
index e1354f263510..6a595771086d 100644
--- a/toolchain/musl/common.mk
+++ b/toolchain/musl/common.mk
@@ -
Am 22.05.2020 um 12:29 schrieb Kalle Valo:
(please don't top post)
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
this code is not in use in its original form for ipq4019. i have seen
that his patch is also dropped from ath.git but is still in use by
openwrt. could somone clarify the state here and why it wa
(please don't top post)
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
> this code is not in use in its original form for ipq4019. i have seen
> that his patch is also dropped from ath.git but is still in use by
> openwrt. could somone clarify the state here and why it was dropped?
I dropped the patch because of
I noticed procd regression caused by libubox commit 75e300aeec25
("blobmsg: fix wrong payload len passed from blobmsg_check_array").
Calling "/etc/init.d/network restart" over and over will eventually
result in procd not starting netifd. Sometimes failure doesn't occur
and reboot is required. Thi
(resending as I forgot to CC the list, sigh)
Hi Perry,
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 6:18 AM Perry Couprie wrote:
> I am trying to compile openwrt for Raspberri PI3.
>
> On of the selected packages to compile in the firmware is GOLANG.
>
> When compiling golang i get the following compile error.
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
