Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC procd] jail: add option to provide /dev/console to containers

2020-04-25 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hi Daniel, Le sam. 25 avr. 2020 à 19:48, Daniel Golle a écrit : > > Create UNIX/98 PTY, pass master fd to procd and setup mount-bind of > slave PTS device on /dev/console inside jail. > Allow attaching to an instance's console by using the newly introduced > ujail-console command (no multiplexing

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC procd] jail: add option to provide /dev/console to containers

2020-04-25 Thread Daniel Golle
Create UNIX/98 PTY, pass master fd to procd and setup mount-bind of slave PTS device on /dev/console inside jail. Allow attaching to an instance's console by using the newly introduced ujail-console command (no multiplexing for now). Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle --- CMakeLists.txt | 6 ++ j

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] x86: fix unusable squashfs images by adding missing padding

2020-04-25 Thread Paul Spooren
On Sat Apr 25, 2020 at 2:56 AM PST, Petr Štetiar wrote: > It was reported, that after image generation rework > x86-64-generic-squashfs-rootfs.img image won't boot on XenServer x86_64 > anymore: > > F2FS-fs (xvda): Magic Mismatch, valid(0xf2f52010) - read(0x84289960) > F2FS-fs (xvda): Can't find va

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] x86: fix unusable squashfs images by adding missing padding

2020-04-25 Thread Paul Spooren
On Sat Apr 25, 2020 at 2:56 AM PST, Petr Štetiar wrote: > It was reported, that after image generation rework > x86-64-generic-squashfs-rootfs.img image won't boot on XenServer x86_64 > anymore: > > F2FS-fs (xvda): Magic Mismatch, valid(0xf2f52010) - read(0x84289960) > F2FS-fs (xvda): Can't find va

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Apr 25, 2020, at 11:46 AM, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > > Am 25.04.2020 um 20:44 schrieb Rosen Penev: > >> This is indeed a v1. Strange that it has 64MB of flash. Maybe someone modded >> it... > > With 64MB could I upgrade to 19.07? > This is the only interesting thing for me, right now..

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 25/04/20 20:30, Luca Bertoncello wrote: Am 25.04.2020 um 20:27 schrieb Alberto Bursi: Hi that's weird, that's 64MB. Maybe a V2 in an older box? What is the CPU? check cat /proc/cpuinfo The V1 has Atheros AR9103. root@OpenWrt:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo system type : Atheros AR9132

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Luca Bertoncello
Am 25.04.2020 um 20:44 schrieb Rosen Penev: > This is indeed a v1. Strange that it has 64MB of flash. Maybe someone modded > it... With 64MB could I upgrade to 19.07? This is the only interesting thing for me, right now... :D Regards Luca Bertoncello (lucab...@lucabert.de)

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Apr 25, 2020, at 11:30 AM, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > > Am 25.04.2020 um 20:27 schrieb Alberto Bursi: > > Hi > >> that's weird, that's 64MB. Maybe a V2 in an older box? >> What is the CPU? >> check cat /proc/cpuinfo >> The V1 has Atheros AR9103. > > root@OpenWrt:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo > s

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Luca Bertoncello
Am 25.04.2020 um 20:27 schrieb Alberto Bursi: Hi > that's weird, that's 64MB. Maybe a V2 in an older box? > What is the CPU? > check cat /proc/cpuinfo > The V1 has Atheros AR9103. root@OpenWrt:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo system type : Atheros AR9132 rev 2 machine : TP-LINK T

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 25/04/20 20:16, Luca Bertoncello wrote: Am 25.04.2020 um 20:12 schrieb Alberto Bursi: If I undestand correct, I can upgrade to 19.07, but it will be the last version I can get, is it right? The main issue is the warning about 32MB of RAM you see on the top of that page. I read it... L

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Apr 25, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > > Am 25.04.2020 um 20:12 schrieb Alberto Bursi: > > Hi > >> The only "discontinued" is the "Availability", and that just means if >> you can still find or buy this device new from somewhere. >> It does not mean anything about OpenWrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Luca Bertoncello
Am 25.04.2020 um 20:12 schrieb Alberto Bursi: Hi > The only "discontinued" is the "Availability", and that just means if > you can still find or buy this device new from somewhere. > It does not mean anything about OpenWrt support of the device. > The device is still supported. OK >> If I undes

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 25/04/20 19:46, Luca Bertoncello wrote: Hi list! I'm not sure, I'm asking to right list, but I didn't found any other list about OpenWRT I can ask... So, I have a "TP-Link TL-WR1043ND v1" running OpenWRT 17.01.4. I'd like to update it to 19.07, but I read on https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Luca Bertoncello
Am 25.04.2020 um 19:54 schrieb Rosen Penev: Hi >> So, I have a "TP-Link TL-WR1043ND v1" running OpenWRT 17.01.4. >> I'd like to update it to 19.07, but I read on >> https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/tp-link/tp-link_tl-wr1043nd_v1 that my >> WLAN-Switch is "discontinued"... > Never heard of this. Min

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Apr 25, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > > Hi list! > > I'm not sure, I'm asking to right list, but I didn't found any other > list about OpenWRT I can ask... > > So, I have a "TP-Link TL-WR1043ND v1" running OpenWRT 17.01.4. > I'd like to update it to 19.07, but I read on >

[OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrading LEDE to 19.07

2020-04-25 Thread Luca Bertoncello
Hi list! I'm not sure, I'm asking to right list, but I didn't found any other list about OpenWRT I can ask... So, I have a "TP-Link TL-WR1043ND v1" running OpenWRT 17.01.4. I'd like to update it to 19.07, but I read on https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/tp-link/tp-link_tl-wr1043nd_v1 that my WLAN-Swi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: backport three upstream fixes

2020-04-25 Thread Petr Štetiar
Petr Štetiar [2020-04-25 14:58:28]: > Another release is overdue for quite some time, so I'm backporting three > fixes from upstream which I plan to backport into 19.07 as well. > > Ref: #2880 sorry, this should've been FS#2880 -- ynezz ___ openwrt-

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: backport three upstream fixes

2020-04-25 Thread Petr Štetiar
Another release is overdue for quite some time, so I'm backporting three fixes from upstream which I plan to backport into 19.07 as well. Ref: #2880 Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar --- package/firmware/wireless-regdb/Makefile | 1 + ...ix-overlapping-ranges-for-Switzerlan.patch | 47 + ...ix

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: Add /etc/shinit for non-login shell init

2020-04-25 Thread Petr Štetiar
Jeffery To [2019-05-03 02:24:27]: Hi, > Because /etc/profile (and ~/.profile) are read by login shells only, > aliases and functions defined there are not available to non-login > shells, e.g. when using screen or tmux. > > If the ENV environment variable exists (exported by /etc/profile or > ~

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] x86: fix unusable squashfs images by adding missing padding

2020-04-25 Thread Petr Štetiar
It was reported, that after image generation rework x86-64-generic-squashfs-rootfs.img image won't boot on XenServer x86_64 anymore: F2FS-fs (xvda): Magic Mismatch, valid(0xf2f52010) - read(0x84289960) F2FS-fs (xvda): Can't find valid F2FS filesystem in 1th superblock F2FS-fs (xvda): Magic Mism