Remove PKG_SOURCE and PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR since the defaults are used.
Remove GLOB_ONLYDIR patch. Does not seem to be needed.
Remove woresize.h file. It does not seem to be needed.
Update features.h file from upstream. Needed for compilation of this
version.
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev
---
The G
The removed patches are all integrated in the upstream version now.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
---
package/kernel/mac80211/Makefile | 6 +-
...th9k-use-iowrite32-over-__raw_writel.patch | 40 -
.../patches/ath/120-owl-loader-compat.patch | 6 +-
.../patches/ath/404-re
The removed patches are all integrated in the upstream version now.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
---
package/kernel/mac80211/Makefile | 6 +-
.../patches/ath/404-regd_no_assoc_hints.patch | 4 +-
...-ackto-to-max-timeout-in-ath_dynack_.patch | 2 +-
...set-but-not-used-variab
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 2:37 PM Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 16:10, wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> > > On Behalf Of Rafal Milecki
> > > Sent: Montag, 30. Dezember 2019 07:55
> > > To: openwrt-
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 16:10, wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> > On Behalf Of Rafal Milecki
> > Sent: Montag, 30. Dezember 2019 07:55
> > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> > Cc: Rafał Miłecki
> > Subject: [OpenWrt
Hi Paul,
Hi Robert,
> Sorry, I did not know about that situation but after a look it seems
> that squashfs-tools is more up to date that the fork.
> There has been a 4.4 release and couple of patches each month to it.
you're right! I would like to discontinue squashfskit. It had it's
reason, but
On Saturday, 21 March 2020 14:05:53 CET Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds the kernel patches needed for the Gemini.
> Just 7 patches, 5 of them are already upstream.
>
> Notably we backport the patches to use the temperature
> sensor on the hard drive to drive temperature control
> of the NAS chass
This adds a kernel config file for the v5.4 gemini
kernel.
No major changes compared to v4.19, mainly
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI was renamed to
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_GEMINI.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
---
target/linux/gemini/config-5.4 | 489 +
1 file changed, 4
The v5.4 kernel already works much better than v4.19
as so many things got upstreamed so let's just bump
it to kernel v5.4.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
---
target/linux/gemini/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/gemini/Makefile b/target/linu
Sorry for taking so long!
Now that so many other ports have switched to v5.4 I don't want
Gemini to lag behind.
The v5.4 kernel was tested successfully on D-Link DNS-313,
D-Link DIR-685 and Itian Square One SQ201.
Linus Walleij (3):
gemini: Add v5.4 kernel patches
gemini: Add kernel config f
This adds the kernel patches needed for the Gemini.
Just 7 patches, 5 of them are already upstream.
Notably we backport the patches to use the temperature
sensor on the hard drive to drive temperature control
of the NAS chassis. This is required for the DIR-685
which has no external temperature se
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:11 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wan't squashfskit4 created as a workaround for an inactive upstream
> maintainer? Wouldn't it make sense to move back to upstream now that it
> is more up to date than our fork?
>
> Best,
> Paul
>
Sorry, I did not know about that situ
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:27:09PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> This series enables packaging of the Linux hwmon, watchdog and gpio
> drivers that support multiple Fintek Super-IO chips. In particular,
> the Fintek F71869A is used on the Jetway NF99FL board and the stock
> OpenWRT kernels appear to
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 09:38:27AM +, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I’ve just done a fix for this. Just waiting for a build to complete
> before I push it.
>
> In essence, the kernel hack patches for 4.19 were copied to 5.4. The
> patch in 4.19 was fixed but the on
Hi Sebastian,
I’ve just done a fix for this. Just waiting for a build to complete before I
push it.
In essence, the kernel hack patches for 4.19 were copied to 5.4. The patch in
4.19 was fixed but the one in 5.4 got forgotten about, since no one was
actually building with a 5.4 kernel till n
Hi all,
strongswan fails to compile since many weeks:
In file included from
/builder/shared-workdir/build/sdk/staging_dir/toolchain-aarch64_cortex-a53_gcc-8.4.0_musl/include/linux/netfilter/xt_CONNMARK.h:5,
from connmark_listener.c:30:
/builder/shared-workdir/build/sdk/staging_d
16 matches
Mail list logo
