[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2] scripts/gen_image_generic.sh: use /bin/sh

This has nothing bash specific. Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev --- scripts/gen_image_generic.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/gen_image_generic.sh b/scripts/gen_image_generic.sh index 527ca5bacc..10a8495c4f 100755 --- a/scripts/gen_image_generic.sh +++ b

openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

-o is not well defined. Found with shellcheck. Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev --- scripts/gen_image_generic.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/gen_image_generic.sh b/scripts/gen_image_generic.sh index 2c57d56f07..527ca5bacc 100755 --- a/scripts/gen_im

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] libcxx: Remove -flto from LDFLAGS

It seems the buildbots can't handle it. Added a cmake option to find the cxxabi files as they are part of the toolchain and not in the normal path. It doesn't seem to make a difference, just gets rid of cmake warnings. Added another small GCC warning fix. It's fairly minor. This has no change in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx: Remove mtd cfi_cmdset_0002 status check patch

Hi, Thanks for the confirmation. Yes your understanding is correct. Also I could understand it as rejected patch since ar71xx is deprecated. By the way how about ath79 is if deprecated as same? Since there are same patches in ath79 also. Regards, Ikegami On 2020/01/03 22:43, m...@adrianschmut

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Replying to old mails (Was: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel, v5, 2/2] Allow sysupgrade restore on ER)

Paul Fertser [2020-01-03 15:55:24]: > wget > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/private/openwrt-devel.mbox/openwrt-devel.mbox?username=\&password= > > to retrieve full mailing list archive in mailbox format and use > his/her favourite MUA to comfortably reply to any given mail. Thanks a lot fo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx: Remove mtd cfi_cmdset_0002 status check patch

Hi, your patch "ar71xx: Remove mtd cfi_cmdset_0002 status check patch" looks cosmetical to me. Is this impression correct? If yes, since ar71xx is effectively deprecated and won't be included in next (after-19.07) release, I would reject it to save reviewing time for other changes. I hope you

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of ad...@kryma.net > Sent: Donnerstag, 14. November 2019 23:40 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: Pavel Balan > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] ath79: add support for C

[OpenWrt-Devel] Replying to old mails (Was: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel, v5, 2/2] Allow sysupgrade restore on ER)

Hi, Somewhat related, On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 01:34:43PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote: > I do not have the old e-mails for those changes, thus I cannot respond > correctly. One can do wget http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/private/openwrt-devel.mbox/openwrt-devel.mbox?username=\&pas

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Kernel version for OpenWrt 20.X

Hi Hauke, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens > Sent: Donnerstag, 28. November 2019 19:42 > To: Adrian Schmutzler ; 'OpenWrt Development > List' > Cc: 'Koen Vandeputte' > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Ke

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Devel, 5/9] sunxi: add support for pine64 lts

Hi, I do not have the old e-mails for those changes, thus I cannot respond correctly: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/list/?series=86042 sunxi target has seen some changes in the meantime, particularly the split of DEVICE_TITLE and the calculation of the DTS name. Please submit a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Devel, v5, 2/2] Allow sysupgrade restore on ER

Hi, I do not have the old e-mails for those changes, thus I cannot respond correctly. Still, both (very old) patches miss commit message and, more importantly, Signed-off, so I will mark them as "Changes Requested". [OpenWrt-Devel,v5,1/2] Evaluate board names in alphabetical order [OpenWrt-Dev