Dne 19. 05. 19 v 11:24 Hauke Mehrtens napsal(a):
> On 5/18/19 4:08 AM, Petr Cvek wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I'm finishing the ethernet driver and it is still sort of slow for my
>> taste, but it seems I've reached the hardware limit.
>
> Will you send these patches also to the upstream kernel? I wo
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:30 PM Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>
> A section can store its name in the same memory region as the section
> (after the actual section object). The object is then reallocated when the
> type is later changed via an uci_set. But the original address of the
> section is (indirec
On 2019-05-13 23:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 5/12/19 10:24 PM, Daniel Engberg wrote:
Hi,
This patch seems to touch more things that just that... (4.19)
I did a "make kernel_oldconfig" to refresh the configuration. This was
either not done when this configuration was added, the ge
On 5/23/19 2:16 PM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Paul Spooren [2019-05-23 13:36:37]:
>
>> No, thanks for the link. Seems that Docker now uses LXC anyway which
> No more[1] :-)
>
> Remove LXC support.
>
> The LXC driver was deprecated in Docker 1.8. Following the deprecation
> rules, we can remove a
Paul Spooren [2019-05-23 13:36:37]:
> No, thanks for the link. Seems that Docker now uses LXC anyway which
No more[1] :-)
Remove LXC support.
The LXC driver was deprecated in Docker 1.8. Following the deprecation
rules, we can remove a deprecated feature after two major releases. LXC won't
Paul Spooren [2019-05-23 13:38:52]:
> >> +++ b/state.c
> >> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ static void state_enter(void)
> >>switch (state) {
> >>case STATE_EARLY:
> >>LOG("- early -\n");
> >> + if (is_container())
> >> + LOG("This isn't real life. I'm running i
On 5/23/19 10:42 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Paul Spooren [2019-05-22 19:24:19]:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren
>> ---
>> state.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/state.c b/state.c
>> index ff1734f..9f196ee 100644
>> --- a/state.c
>> +++ b/state.c
>> @@ -101,6 +101,
Hi,
On 5/23/19 12:30 PM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> I'm wondering if this Docker related changes shouldn't be included as a part
> of a patch series which would add complete Docker support to OpenWrt (do you
> plan to do this?), so it could be tested together.
>
> Or is it now possible to just download
Paul Spooren [2019-05-22 19:24:18]:
I'm wondering if this Docker related changes shouldn't be included as a part
of a patch series which would add complete Docker support to OpenWrt (do you
plan to do this?), so it could be tested together.
Or is it now possible to just download OpenWrt image an
Paul Spooren [2019-05-22 19:24:19]:
> Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren
> ---
> state.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/state.c b/state.c
> index ff1734f..9f196ee 100644
> --- a/state.c
> +++ b/state.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ static void state_enter(void)
> switch (st
10 matches
Mail list logo
