Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Time to move on from 4.14 to 4.19?

2019-05-13 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 5/12/19 10:37 PM, Daniel Engberg wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure what the current release roadmap is but since 19.X release > seems to slipping perhaps it's time to move working targets to 4.19 as > 4.14 has barely 6 months away before EoL status since there seems to be > a rather strong opinion

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] octeon: Deactivate MIPS O32 and N32 support

2019-05-13 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
Hi Daniel, On 5/12/19 10:24 PM, Daniel Engberg wrote: > Hi, > > This patch seems to touch more things that just that... (4.19) I did a "make kernel_oldconfig" to refresh the configuration. This was either not done when this configuration was added, the generic configuration changed or some new K

[OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k TPC reg. domain incorrect?

2019-05-13 Thread Sam Samy
Hi, I installed master branch openwrt onto Asus MAP-AC2200 AP. It has tri band. Its based on IPQ4019 DK04 QCA reference platform. 2 radios (2Ghz/5Ghz) on AHB bus and one 5GHZ on PCIe bus. Its generally working fine except one problem in 5Ghz. On both the 5Ghz radios the RSSI is pretty low on any 5

[OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] sysupgrade-tar: board_name in Image Generation vs. Run Time

2019-05-13 Thread Jeff Kletsky
TL;DR What would be a workable plan to reconcile mfgr_specific-board-name at image-generation time with mfgr,specific-board-name at run time? With the apparent tree-wide changes in progress to canonicalize board naming of TARGET_DEVICES to mfgr_specific-board-name, there becomes a disconnect b

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] imx6: apalis: fix config survival after sysupgrade -n

2019-05-13 Thread Petr Štetiar
This patch fixes `sysupgrade -n` when flashed with rootfs of the same size as currently running, so the rootfs_data wouldn't get destroyed and thus survive reboot. So let's fix it by always cleaning up the content of the rootfs_data during sysupgrade. Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar --- target/linux

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][RFC] opkg: add License to info command

2019-05-13 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, please make sure that the license info is only parsed when it is required by the toplevel command being executed, look at the other usages of the PFM_* macros in the source. Without this, the in-memory representation of the package trees will consume way more RAM due to the redundant license