[OpenWrt-Devel] Port forwarding strangely broken w/ multi-uplink setup + flow offloading (mt7621)

2018-12-20 Thread Ivan Shapovalov
Hey, (I'm sorry if I'm writing to a wrong list but I don't see any other channels apart from #openwrt which is likely not watched by anyone.) I have a multi-uplink setup on a mt7621-based router (Xiaomi R3G). This setup uses two routing tables and connmark rules in mangle: == 8< == # cat /etc/i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH procd] hotplug.c: Make sure hotplug buffer is NULL terminated

2018-12-20 Thread Paul Oranje
> Op 19 dec. 2018, om 12:19 heeft Hauke Mehrtens het > volgende geschreven: > > Sets the final byte explicitly to NULL because we later do string > operations on this buffer. > > Fixes Coverity issue 1430926 String not null terminated > > Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens > --- > plug/hotplug.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

2018-12-20 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 20/12/18 20:46, James Feeney wrote: On 12/20/18 8:54 AM, Alberto Bursi wrote: So no, the 4/32 warning should stay and remain loud and clear so newbies won't be frustrated by low end devices. There also seems to be a presumption that a "newbie" is, or should be, running luci. I believe

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v1] apm821xx: switch MX60(W)'s recovery images to multi-image method

2018-12-20 Thread Christian Lamparter
In the past, the MX60(W)'s recovery images always had problems with the size restriction and never really worked without manual intervention. But starting with 4.19, the MX60(W)'s kernel image outgrew the allocated space for sysupgrade images as well. Hence This patch reworks the initramfs, which a

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ipq40xx: disable kernel-padding for DNI image

2018-12-20 Thread David Bauer
This commit removes the fixed kernel size-padding for the Netgear DNI image creation as it is not necessary for a working image. The fake rootfs still needs to be padded to the blocksize. Tested-By: Christian Lamparter Signed-off-by: David Bauer --- target/linux/ipq40xx/image/Makefile | 5 ++--

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

2018-12-20 Thread Tom Psyborg
On 20/12/2018, camden lindsay wrote: > Tom- > Out of curiosity is your device being used as an access point, or as a > router? It is used as a router with NAT between USB WLAN and SoC WLAN networks ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.ope

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

2018-12-20 Thread Fernando Frediani
On 20/12/2018 17:46, James Feeney wrote: There also seems to be a presumption that a "newbie" is, or should be, running luci. I believe that that is also an inappropriate assumption. I think that is a pretty reasonable assumption. A newbie does need a web interface. I would say more: that is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

2018-12-20 Thread James Feeney
On 12/20/18 8:54 AM, Alberto Bursi wrote: > My TL-WR1043ND v1.9 (still a ar71xx) is in this category, 8/32 but can't run > opkg due to low ram unless I kill luci first. I believe that this apparent presumption that luci will be installed is inappropriate, especially in the context of a discussio

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

2018-12-20 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 2018-12-15 15:08, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi, I'm against rejecting such submissions if they're self-contained enough (e.g. for DTS based targets as mentioned by Piotr). I'd favor accepting the basic board support for such boards but disabling the image generation (commented out). I agree

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

2018-12-20 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 20/12/18 14:37, Tom Psyborg wrote: This is true. 32mb is misinterpretted as a limitation among several forum/wiki articles while storage space is being the only serious limitation. I have ar71xx running on 32M RAM device, basic configuration with luci-ssl and secondary wifi interface (ath9k_

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

2018-12-20 Thread Tom Psyborg
This is true. 32mb is misinterpretted as a limitation among several forum/wiki articles while storage space is being the only serious limitation. I have ar71xx running on 32M RAM device, basic configuration with luci-ssl and secondary wifi interface (ath9k_htc), most of the time when i log into dev

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel: add kmod-usb-gadget-cdc-composite

2018-12-20 Thread Karl Pálsson
This builds the "g_cdc" gadget module, providing ethernet+serial. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson --- package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk b/package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk index fafa9a021e.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] New CT firmware images

2018-12-20 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, pushed as https://git.openwrt.org/c0248183a49a9830a4a2458e54e83fa8a3c646c9 after some smoke testing on a QCA9882 (Netgear R6100) ~ Jo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.