The board is manufactured by Digilent
Main features:
- Soc: XC7Z010 (Z7-10) or XC7Z020 (Z7-20)
- RAM: 1 GB DDR3L
- FLASH: 16 MB QSPI
- 1 Gbps Ethernet
- USB 2.0
- microSD slot
- Pcam camera connector
- HDMI Tx and Rx
- Audio codec: stereo out, stereo in, mic
- 5 (Z7-10) or 6 (Z7-20) Pmod ports
- 6
This series adds support for the Digilent Zybo Z7 board
Most patches are already upstreamed except for one that
is still in review on U-Boot's mailing list
All changes has been compiled and run tested on the board
Luis Araneda (2):
uboot-zynq: add support for the zybo z7 board
zynq: add supp
Backport board support from the upcoming v2018.09 release,
and add an additional patch to read the MAC address
from flash memory
Signed-off-by: Luis Araneda
---
package/boot/uboot-zynq/Makefile | 7 +-
...nq-add-support-for-the-zybo-z7-board.patch | 513 ++
...ad-m
LGTM
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 6:21 PM, Luis Araneda wrote:
>
> This fixes a problem that's causing an early return of
> default_prerm() when the package prerm script has an
> exit statement at the end, which is implemented as
> "exit 0" by most of the packages that use prerm
>
> With the new beha
This fixes a problem that's causing an early return of
default_prerm() when the package prerm script has an
exit statement at the end, which is implemented as
"exit 0" by most of the packages that use prerm
With the new behavior, the execution of default_prerm()
will continue only if the prerm scr
> > > curious what i missed as my archer-c7-v4 is working fine. TPLINK
> > > AC1750 device
> > Hi,
> > please dont top post
> > I have no idea what you are asking.
> >
>
> Meaning I don't understand his issue mine works fine, so I'm curious as to
> what's different
I would guess you didn't cha
Hello all, my names craig and I was just wondering if openwrt currently
support, or plan to support the zyxel NBG6617 router, I just purchassed it from
amazon, so would rather not brick it by trying to install the firmware unless I
know it's definitely going to work.
thank you for any help,
take
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 17:10 John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 22/08/18 12:02, Outback Dingo wrote:
> > curious what i missed as my archer-c7-v4 is working fine. TPLINK
> > AC1750 device
> Hi,
> please dont top post
> I have no idea what you are asking.
>
Meaning I don't understand his issue mine
Unrelated to upgrade. I have dnsmasq and ntpd script disabled, i make a
backup, then reset my device to defaults or flash some other image without
keeping settings. After flashing back image version from which the backup
was made and restoring backup, dnsmasq and ntpd are enabled again. So these
se
OK, which AP and client devices you used while doing that test?
On 23 August 2018 at 16:08, Dirk Brenken wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I haven't run any special/formal speed tests, just one speedtest.net
> measurement with "usual" 209 Mbps Download and 9.9 Mbps Upload
> (Unitymedia cable connect) via 2
Well, Engenious or Senao have been ignoring GPL source request for a while.
And completely violating the GPL licence.
On 20 August 2018 at 16:26, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
> GPL doesn't prevent the manufacturer from blocking third-party
> firmware being installed on their router.
> They just need to
Yes, you need to rebuild after edit.
Regards,
Udaya
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Preeti Sethi wrote:
> Sir,
>
> I am a B.Tech student currently doing research on co-existence of WiFi and
> LTE as an intern at IIT Hyderabad.
> I have installed Openwrt in *Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H* which is us
> A bit off-topic, but what does OF stand for ?
> (that legacy code does not use DT is known).
>
OF stands for Open Firmware.
It doesn't use the DT, but the code is still there in many cases. It
is not cut out by prerocessor in many cases.
___
openwrt-d
Op 23 aug. 2018, om 16:15 heeft Dmitry Tunin het
volgende geschreven:
> I think the kernel became so big because of the extra code related to
> building both OF and legacy code in many palaces.
A bit off-topic, but what does OF stand for ?
(that legacy code does not use DT is known).
_
> There are other shortcomings along with upgraded kernel e.g. the
> kernel is getting so big that we may not be able to use 4M flash with
> even just basic functions of a router in a near future.
> (I remember that someone successfully fit USB support and Samba into
> 4M flash using OpenWrt Backfi
On 2018-08-22 16:14, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
ar71xx:
I'm now currently testing your ar71xx 4.14 bump (comitted today in
master) on a few different targets:
- Gl-mifi
- Rocket-m5
- RB912
- RB2011
...
Will let you know the results.
Hi John,
I started with trying on a Mikrotik RB2011 as
On Do, 2018-08-23 at 14:36 +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> Hi Dirk
>
> You say: "works quite fine, both radios are available,
> no issues at all"
>
> but no feedback on how it actually performs...
>
> From my test I got throughput of 215Mbps on 2.4GHz wifi with 4.9
> After upgraded to 4.14 the thro
Hi!
Tom Psyborg 于2018年8月23日周四 下午8:36写道：
>
> Hi Dirk
>
> You say: "works quite fine, both radios are available,
> no issues at all"
>
> but no feedback on how it actually performs...
>
> From my test I got throughput of 215Mbps on 2.4GHz wifi with 4.9
> After upgraded to 4.14 the throughput droppe
Without UHCI a non-trivial number of machines will have no keyboard
without BIOS assistance.
Add XHCI as well in case there are chipsets which don't support legacy
interfaces, and support PCI OHCI controllers also.
Signed-off-by: Alex Maclean
---
target/linux/x86/config-4.14 | 6 +-
1 file
Hi Dirk
You say: "works quite fine, both radios are available,
no issues at all"
but no feedback on how it actually performs...
From my test I got throughput of 215Mbps on 2.4GHz wifi with 4.9
After upgraded to 4.14 the throughput dropped to 185-190Mbps. same
device same settings and testing co
On 2018-08-23 12:17, John Crispin wrote:
On 23/08/18 11:53, Martin Schiller wrote:
The mcp23s08 drivers was moved from gpio to pinctrl "subsystem" in
linux-4.13.
As linux-4.9 is still used for some targets, how to proceed with this
mcp23s08 driver?
Create a new (second) CONFIG option (kmod-pi
On 23/08/18 11:53, Martin Schiller wrote:
The mcp23s08 drivers was moved from gpio to pinctrl "subsystem" in
linux-4.13.
As linux-4.9 is still used for some targets, how to proceed with this
mcp23s08 driver?
Create a new (second) CONFIG option (kmod-pinctrl-mcp23s08) coexisting
to the kmod-
On 23/08/18 11:34, Dirk Brenken wrote:
Hi,
I've tested two router with latest master & kernel 4.14
(OpenWrt SNAPSHOT, r7906-7e73e9128f)
- TP-Link RE-450v1 => works quite fine, both radios are available,
no issues at all
- GL-AR750 => 2,4G works OK, 5G is no longer available, e.g. default
wif
The mcp23s08 drivers was moved from gpio to pinctrl "subsystem" in
linux-4.13.
As linux-4.9 is still used for some targets, how to proceed with this
mcp23s08 driver?
Create a new (second) CONFIG option (kmod-pinctrl-mcp23s08) coexisting
to the kmod-gpio-mcp23s08?
Or is it possible to get thi
Hi,
I've tested two router with latest master & kernel 4.14
(OpenWrt SNAPSHOT, r7906-7e73e9128f)
- TP-Link RE-450v1 => works quite fine, both radios are available,
no issues at all
- GL-AR750 => 2,4G works OK, 5G is no longer available, e.g. default
wifi configuration via 'wifi config' kernel 4
From: Nuno Morais
Fix tabs vs spaces
Add new optional argument to function header
to add CA_certificate to avoid replicated code
This patch depends on patch
"[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ustream-ssl: add optional mutual authentication (mTLS)"
Signed-off-by: Nuno Morais
Co-Developed-by: Jose Vieira
Fix tabs vs spaces, the cast to (void *) is according to the other casts.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Morais
Co-Developed-by: Jose Vieira
---
ustream-internal.h | 1 +
ustream-mbedtls.c | 10 ++
ustream-openssl.c | 12
ustream-ssl.c | 1 +
ustream-ssl.h | 2 ++
5 fil
It may have sense of doing the ack this in some cases. I need to do
some hardware testing to look at it more closely.
I think we can leave it is is. It's not important as I said before for
slow devices.
But the miscintc is redefined in ar7100.dtsi. So I am happy with that.
We need to have change i
> This is true for ar7100. On other chips the entire
> RST_MISC_INTERRUPT_STATUS block is marked as Read/Write-to-Clear.
Do you have the ar7240 datasheet with those specs?
> > It makes no sense to have a separate ack done this way. It slow things down.
> You can use an implementation without ack f
29 matches
Mail list logo
