On 18/02/18 13:46, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Hi John,
I've implemented the suggested improvements and performed some more
reformatting to match the codestyle of uclient more closely.
Regards
Tobias Schramm
Hi Tobias,
merged most of them alread, please fix/resend 4/7 and 6/7
John
Chang
On 18/02/18 13:46, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Add some error handling for errors during assembly of headers
Signed-off-by: Tobias Schramm
Hi,
3 nitpicks inline ...
---
uclient-http.c | 32
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ucli
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:41 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> please dont top post.
Apologies! Thank you for the kind reminder.
> ath79 is the same as ar71xx but uses dts files instead of mach files
Right, does that mean there might be an ath79 target, which is not
ready yet, or am I confusing things?
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2018, 22:43:42 CET schrieb Hauke Mehrtens:
> ...
>
> The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
> ...
> * mxs
> ...
a few weeks ago, I was in contact with Zoltan who started working
on 4.14 support for mxs. I found some patches in his staging repo
and added
On 19/02/18 13:54, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
Hi John,
As a user of an ar71xx (WNDR3800) on OpenWrt, I'd like to ask if your
desire is that ar71xx never gets bumped up to anything higher than 4.9
or it's just not 4.14 because of some specific reasons related to 4.14?
IOW, shall I be looking f
Hi John,
As a user of an ar71xx (WNDR3800) on OpenWrt, I'd like to ask if your
desire is that ar71xx never gets bumped up to anything higher than 4.9 or
it's just not 4.14 because of some specific reasons related to 4.14?
IOW, shall I be looking for a replacement because I'll stay on 4.9 forever?
Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not
> be included in the next release:
> * gemini
This is a platform that upstream seems to be actually working on,
would it not be at least polite to keep it alive while it's
landing in mainline? I don't have any
On 19/02/18 09:12, Lucian Cristian wrote:
On 19.02.2018 08:41, John Crispin wrote:
On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in t
On 19.02.2018 08:41, John Crispin wrote:
On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.
I did some overview of the
