On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
>> (resend, this time as plain text)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
>> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
>>
On Tue, 30 May 2017 at 08:38, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> > (resend, this time as plain text)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remebe
On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering t
On 29 May 2017 at 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal with many
> details will delay th
*) rules
- owrt will adopt the lede rules and voting system
ACK from me aswell.
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most
people said they did not care
- as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so c
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 09:03:57AM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted
Le 05/29/17 à 00:03, John Crispin a écrit :
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
On 29-05-17 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please
> remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the
> p
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
On 29 May 2017 at 14:46, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Carlo Lobrano writes:
>
> > On 29 May 2017 at 14:24, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Great! And if you reboot the modem in this state, does it still come up
> >> as connected?
> >
> >
> >
> > Nope, still "disconnected"
>
> Then I believe everythin
Carlo Lobrano writes:
> On 29 May 2017 at 14:24, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>>
>> Great! And if you reboot the modem in this state, does it still come up
>> as connected?
>
>
>
> Nope, still "disconnected"
Then I believe everything works as expected.
Bjørn
On 29 May 2017 at 14:24, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> Great! And if you reboot the modem in this state, does it still come up
> as connected?
Nope, still "disconnected"
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.
Carlo Lobrano writes:
>>
>> Probably. My point was just that you could try to include
>> "--autoconnect", which will disable the autoconnect feature. I am too
>> lazy to bother to write the whole command ;-)
>
>
> I understand :D
>
> By the way, it looks like that the handle for
> when-you-dont
>
> Probably. My point was just that you could try to include
> "--autoconnect", which will disable the autoconnect feature. I am too
> lazy to bother to write the whole command ;-)
I understand :D
By the way, it looks like that the handle for
when-you-dont-know-what-the-handle-is is 0xFFF
Carlo Lobrano writes:
>> AFAICS, that is the expected result. The modem is connected and you do
>> not disconnect, so "start-network" has no effect.
>
> Yes, you're right, but why am I connected in the first place? There is no
> context configured
If autoconnect is enabled, then I believe the m
Hi Bjørn,
thanks for the reply
> AFAICS, that is the expected result. The modem is connected and you do
> not disconnect, so "start-network" has no effect.
Yes, you're right, but why am I connected in the first place? There is no
context configured
> If "--set-autoconnect disabled" does not wo
On 2017-05-29 13:10, Jamie Stuart wrote:
See another iteration, with:
- correct capitalisation
- antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
- open sans typeface (open source)
- mockups of website header
- accent colours
http://i.imgur.com/ZKtcFXo.png
Nice :) Personally I like the
Carlo Lobrano writes:
> Hello,
>
> Hope this is the right place to ask for help and my apologies if it is not.
>
> I'm testing uqmi with a Telit LE910 LTE modem on Ubuntu 16.10, but I'm
> facing this weird issue.
> Uqmi considers the modem connected from the very beginning, even if I
> haven't ru
See another iteration, with:
- correct capitalisation
- antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
- open sans typeface (open source)
- mockups of website header
- accent colours
http://i.imgur.com/ZKtcFXo.png
> On 29 May 2017, at 13:52, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29/05/17 1
On 29/05/17 12:11, Jamie Stuart wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
moving forward.
For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and
not tied to the name of an old router!)
However, it seems the consensus is tha
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Jamie Stuart wrote:
> Hi,
> First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
> moving forward.
> For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and
> not tied to the name of an old router!)
>
> However, it s
Hi,
First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
moving forward.
For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and
not tied to the name of an old router!)
However, it seems the consensus is that the OpenWrt name should remain. I
though
Hello,
Hope this is the right place to ask for help and my apologies if it is not.
I'm testing uqmi with a Telit LE910 LTE modem on Ubuntu 16.10, but I'm
facing this weird issue.
Uqmi considers the modem connected from the very beginning, even if I
haven't run --start-network yet and even if I us
On 29/05/17 10:39, Tom Psyborg wrote:
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load.
Regards,
Jo
Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources.
About slow down, hav
> Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
> resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load.
>
> Regards,
> Jo
>
>
Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources. About
slow down, have you ever chekced the server it is hosted on, or c
Hi Tom,
> I'd vote for re-enabling trac for all users, instead of wasting time and
> resources on another flyspray instance or even existing one which
> compared to trac does not bring any breakthrough features.
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a si
On 29 May 2017 at 08:56, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
>
> *) trac
> - trac is already readonly, keep content so that search engines can still
> find the it
> - edit t
(resend, this time as plain text)
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
with many details will delay the remerge
30 matches
Mail list logo
