Dear Markus, dear Steven,
[openwrt-devel in CC]
We've just spent the afternoon debugging an interesting issue.
After installing hnetd-nossl, the router no longer answers to link-local
IPv6 addresses -- it still has the fe80:: addresses assigned, it receives
neighbour solicitations, but doesn't s
Signed-off-by: Dirk Feytons
---
package/libs/openssl/Makefile |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/Makefile b/package/libs/openssl/Makefile
index 4782c42..d10b447 100644
--- a/package/libs/openssl/Makefile
+++ b/package/libs/openssl/Makefil
Signed-off-by: Dirk Feytons
---
package/libs/openssl/Config.in |5 +
package/libs/openssl/Makefile |9 +++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/Config.in b/package/libs/openssl/Config.in
index 7224b65..e1d9952 100644
--- a/package
NPN has been superseded by ALPN so NPN is disabled by default
The patch has been sent to OpenSSL for inclusion, see
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1100
Signed-off-by: Dirk Feytons
---
package/libs/openssl/Config.in |5 +
package/libs/openssl/Makefile
The patch needed for this commit has been sent upstream:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1155
Signed-off-by: Dirk Feytons
---
package/libs/openssl/Makefile |7 +++---
.../openssl/patches/302-fix_no_cmac_build.patch| 24
2 files changed,
Signed-off-by: Dirk Feytons
---
package/libs/openssl/Config.in |5 +
package/libs/openssl/Makefile |7 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/Config.in b/package/libs/openssl/Config.in
index 492b042..7224b65 100644
--- a/package/li
By default it's disabled. After the CRIME attack it seems the use of
compression is discouraged.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Feytons
---
package/libs/openssl/Config.in |5 +
package/libs/openssl/Makefile | 13 ++---
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/packa
Signed-off-by: Dirk Feytons
---
package/libs/openssl/Config.in |5 +
package/libs/openssl/Makefile |7 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/Config.in b/package/libs/openssl/Config.in
index 3d76dab..aa94300 100644
--- a/package/li
This set of patches introduces a couple of config options to leave out stuff
from OpenSSL. Additionally the hardcoded configure options have been extended
to omit some rarely used functionality and algorithms.
I'm not sure about the defaults for the introduced config options so please
take a closer
Yes, you're right both patch are related.
I'm trying to get more flexibility in mountd by passing the mount command
options through UCI.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:02 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/06/2016 12:00, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> > 2016-06-10 11:37 GMT+02:00 :
> >
On 10/06/2016 12:00, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> 2016-06-10 11:37 GMT+02:00 :
>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Hardouin
>> ---
>
> Your patch doesn't have a commit message, which explains why these
> options are required by default.
>
> I've used mountd recently with ext4 and was able to
Hi Oliver,
2016-06-10 11:37 GMT+02:00 :
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Hardouin
> ---
Your patch doesn't have a commit message, which explains why these
options are required by default.
I've used mountd recently with ext4 and was able to read/write the
mounted filesystem out of the box.
Mathias
>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Hardouin
---
package/system/mountd/files/mountd.config | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/system/mountd/files/mountd.config
b/package/system/mountd/files/mountd.config
index 5610129..c105606 100644
--- a/package/system
Move (previously hardcoded) mount option to UCI to allow different
configuration
like charset (utf-8 or iso) and filesystem driver (if alternative ones are
used).
The fs names are changed in lowercase to comply with UCI general naming.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Hardouin
---
mount.c | 69
I can make a config option for it if you like and enable it by default.
(FYI: no-srp saves almost 16K on libcrypto and 9,5K on libssl)
Dirk F.
On 9 June 2016 at 23:39, Karl Palsson wrote:
> On this one, does SRP have to be included? I'm not using it, and
> i know it's super uncommon, but it's l
15 matches
Mail list logo
