Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OT] Implemented: not an ML erase button but at least a rethink switch

2016-05-26 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:29 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > hope you're doing well nowadays. > > I sincerely appreciate your participation in the discussions surrounding > the whole OpenWrt/LEDE topic especially since it helps giving another, > outside perspective to the entire is

[OpenWrt-Devel] TR-069 for OpenWrt

2016-05-26 Thread Delbar Jos
Hi all, At Technicolor we have followed with great interest the recent proposals to enhance OpenWrt with an open source solution for TR-069 remote management. As one of the world's largest vendors of modems and routers for carrier applications, making use of OpenWrt in a significant share of ou

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

2016-05-26 Thread Stefan Peter
Dear Jo-Philipp Wich On 26.05.2016 13:43, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi all, > > I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be > summarized as: ... I'm just a lurker on this list but this is exactly the kind of email I have missed in the past. I have no moral right to com

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

2016-05-26 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Dear Kathy, > I appreciate your well-written summary and the notable improvements. > Moving to git and keeping history, improving the web site and > documentation to enable more collaboration, making workflows more > efficient and open, etc. had been discussed during face-to-face > gatherings of O

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

2016-05-26 Thread Fernando Frediani
Wow. What a great email !!! OpenWrt core people who have decided to stay with the project think carefully about it. In my humble vision reunite with LEDE new ideas and keeping the well stabilished OpenWrt name is the ideal scenario. Put aside the diferences and makd an effort for this to happen.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

2016-05-26 Thread Kathy Giori
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi all, > > I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be > summarized as: > > - Launching the new LEDE project/fork/reboot without discussing >matters in advance with the developers not being involved was >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

2016-05-26 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi all, I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be summarized as: - Launching the new LEDE project/fork/reboot without discussing matters in advance with the developers not being involved was perceived in a hostile action damaging OpenWrt - It has been claimed

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OT] Implemented: not an ML erase button but at least a rethink switch

2016-05-26 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Daniel, hope you're doing well nowadays. I sincerely appreciate your participation in the discussions surrounding the whole OpenWrt/LEDE topic especially since it helps giving another, outside perspective to the entire issue. What I noticed is that you're sometimes generating like 80% of the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] I've come round to your way of thinking

2016-05-26 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:38:42AM -0400, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: > I'm sorry [...] > no worries. :) > despite how overly strong you come into this discussion. > yeah, i'm known for being not exactly the greatest diplomat. :} ___ openwrt-devel mai