Hello All,
Working on an RT5350 based system with a generic version of CC 15.05 and the also the latest trunk head I noticed that
the WiFi performance was very poor. ssh was very sluggish and file transfers would hang after about 150Kbytes of data
were transferred.
After some investigation
The switch to uci-defaults-new.sh revealed a bug in the former used
uci-defaults.sh, which failed to add leds with colons in the led name.
This bug isn't any longer present in uci-defaults-new.sh and therefore
all via DT defined leds will be added to /etc/config/system with their initial
on/off st
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
---
.../patches/0045-no_extern_inline.patch| 101 +
.../uboot-lantiq/patches/0046-no_weak_alias.patch | 28 ++
.../patches/0047-add-gcc5-support.patch| 93 +++
3 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
crea
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:48 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote:
> Why has this been cross posted to the OpenWrt Development List?
>
> I fail to see any relevance to the usual and prevailing use of this list.
Well, I do keep hoping more folk within openwrt actually try the
hnet-full and babel packages. and u
Why has this been cross posted to the OpenWrt *Development* List?
I fail to see any relevance to the usual and prevailing use of this list.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> While I'm dreaming of steadier funding for things I care about,
> ietf homenet wg's work is nearly comp
While I'm dreaming of steadier funding for things I care about,
ietf homenet wg's work is nearly complete.
*most* of the work is already done in openwrt to make all the ietf
homenet proposed standards work, and indeed, be the default in
openwrt. However nobody is funded anymore to take it further,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Eric Schultz
wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. Based upon my conversations at the OpenWrt
> summit and observations, an official OpenWrt Foundation would be a positive
> development. I heard at least a few companies say that they want to help but
> the
* Yousong Zhou [08.12.2015 15:59]:
> respawn is an instance attribute, moving that statement inside the
> open/close instance block should do the job
thanks for the hint, this works!
bye, bastian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openw
Am 08.12.2015 22:45 schrieb "Bastian Bittorf" :
>
> while trying to understand the procd
> respawn-trigger, I wrote this testscript:
>
> #!/bin/sh /etc/rc.common
> START=50
> USE_PROCD=1
> PROG=/tmp/test.sh
>
> start_service()
> {
> {
> echo '#!/bin/sh'
> ech
while trying to understand the procd
respawn-trigger, I wrote this testscript:
#!/bin/sh /etc/rc.common
START=50
USE_PROCD=1
PROG=/tmp/test.sh
start_service()
{
{
echo '#!/bin/sh'
echo 'logger START-$0 $$'
echo 'sleep 10'
ech
On Tue Jun 16 23:16:46 CEST 2015, Stefan Rompf wrote:
Add tuner for the HSR filter of the UniFi Outdoor Plus access point. Usage
of the tuner is controlled at runtime by ath9k_platform_data. The code can
be enabled or disabled by a compile time option.
Dear All,
How do I tell if the above ment
11 matches
Mail list logo