* Petr Štetiar [30.11.2015 13:47]:
> > i bet it's about 300 seconds for a full fresh
> > distributed build for *all* architectures.
>
> That sounds really great, can you please share more details? It's just your
> guess or you've achieved such build times already?
ofcourse we have. even faster.
Here are basically all of my iwlwifi notes in dmesg, although I find
it interesting that yours calls out the interrupt. must have to do
with log level somewhere or something.
Ah, i missed before that you eventually seem to get one to load,
albeit with an error:
[ 23.210567] firmware iwlwifi-7260
I use an intel 7260 with few or no problems.
I'm wondering if this line has something to do with your crashing problems
'[ 23.187368] iwlwifi :04:00.0: Direct firmware load for
iwlwifi-7260-17.ucode failed with error -2'
I'll try to remember to look tonight at my dmesg to see what it looks l
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's a chance to setup snapshot builder for recently
introduced
ARC770 boards?
-Alexey
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
package/base-files/Makefile | 2 +-
package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/boot | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/base-files/Makefile b/package/base-files/Makefile
index cbd8ac0..c73cc73 100644
--- a/packag
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
package/system/procd/files/procd.sh | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/system/procd/files/procd.sh
b/package/system/procd/files/procd.sh
index e83e75c..a2a63f8 100644
--- a/package/system/procd/files/procd.sh
++
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
service/instance.c | 13 +
service/instance.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/service/instance.c b/service/instance.c
index ad0d284..bca36e1 100644
--- a/service/instance.c
+++ b/service/instance.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
jail/jail.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/jail/jail.c b/jail/jail.c
index 97ddaab..541363a 100644
--- a/jail/jail.c
+++ b/jail/jail.c
@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@
#include
#define STACK_SIZE (1024 * 1024)
-#de
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
service/instance.c | 11 +++
service/instance.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/service/instance.c b/service/instance.c
index 586c0ee..ad0d284 100644
--- a/service/instance.c
+++ b/service/instance.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum {
set PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS to 1
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
jail/jail.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/jail/jail.c b/jail/jail.c
index 25ad4d7..97ddaab 100644
--- a/jail/jail.c
+++ b/jail/jail.c
@@ -35,13 +35,14 @@
#include
#define ST
we can now launch multiple time the same
ujail command without conflict
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
jail/jail.c| 64 +++---
service/instance.c | 13 ---
service/instance.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 56 dele
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
service/instance.c | 10 ++
service/instance.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/service/instance.c b/service/instance.c
index 0f4e711..586c0ee 100644
--- a/service/instance.c
+++ b/service/instance.c
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ enum {
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
service/instance.c | 22 ++
service/instance.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/service/instance.c b/service/instance.c
index c478d4b..0f4e711 100644
--- a/service/instance.c
+++ b/service/instance.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
jail/jail.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/jail/jail.c b/jail/jail.c
index 4297f71..5c995e5 100644
--- a/jail/jail.c
+++ b/jail/jail.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int exec_jail(void)
INFO("exec-ing %s\n",
if we forget to close() in the future,
this prevent fd leak
Signed-off-by: Etienne CHAMPETIER
---
jail/elf.c | 2 +-
jail/fs.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/jail/elf.c b/jail/elf.c
index b8f2cc5..7c6076a 100644
--- a/jail/elf.c
+++ b/jail/elf.c
@@ -81,7
Remove -P option (now useless)
Add -c (no_new_privs), -h (hostname)
Add ujail support in procd for -C, -c, -o, -h
Tested on DD x86_64
Etienne CHAMPETIER (9):
ujail: fixup code style // -> /* */
ujail: add O_CLOEXEC flag to open() call
instance, ujail: remove "-P " option
instance, ujail: w
Overlayfs stacking was broken in 4.1.12 but now fixed in upstream branch.
Stacking allows experimenting with configurations without the need to
reset a device to factory config.
Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin
---
.../patches-4.1/510-fs-overlay-fix-stacking.patch | 38 ++
1 fi
On 30 November 2015 at 22:58, Eric Schultz wrote:
> I'm looking into working on improving the testing of builds through a
> distributed, testing system for builds on actual hardware. I'd love to see
> if there's overlap in our work and to see how we can work together.
>
> I'll be having a kickoff
ynezz,
I'm looking into working on improving the testing of builds through a
distributed, testing system for builds on actual hardware. I'd love to see
if there's overlap in our work and to see how we can work together.
I'll be having a kickoff meeting in the next week and you're welcome to
join
This patch adds support for the NuCom R5010UNv2.
It's a BCM6328 based board. It has an onboard BCM43217 wifi chip. For this
wifi chip looks like the brcmsmac driver isn't still supported, b43 drivers are
used
for the profile of the router.
It's worth mentioning this board was affected by a bug s
Hi Andrew.
> Okay. I just want to apologize for hammering this but I have been having
> an issue trying to post the patch using my work email (office365). It
> seemed to want to send it as an attachment with dos line endings tacked
> on for some reason. I think ive got that taken care of now so he
ltq-adsl-mei as well as ltq-adsl build just fine with these compiler
flags, there's no need to disable it.
Signed-off-by: Andre Heider
---
package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-adsl-mei/Makefile | 1 -
package/kernel/lantiq/ltq-adsl/Makefile | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/k
rmilecki mentioned over irc, he'd prefer using "jedec,spi-nor" in this case.
I'll try it out later tonight once I'm home and have serial on the device
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailma
Hi all
On 30.11.2015 08:02, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The script generating the mail used a wrong reference repository
> (http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git).
>
> Relevant commit is:
> http://git.openwrt.org/?p=15.05/openwrt.git;a=commitdiff;h=4d47d61a5f59dc7a487248d6b43e2f536a6d794c
Does anyone had any issues with the Intel 7260 AC Wi-Fi Mini-PCI Express
card?
After selecting the proper iwlwifi modules with support for the 7260 model,
I'm plagued with this issue.
After booting, I keep getting this output. I'm also unable to activate a
regular configuration because the kernel
Okay. I just want to apologize for hammering this but I have been having
an issue trying to post the patch using my work email (office365). It
seemed to want to send it as an attachment with dos line endings tacked
on for some reason. I think ive got that taken care of now so here it
is: Signed-off
Dear All
OpenWrt has for a number of years been a member of SPI-inc - so, OpenWrt
is already part of an umbrella non-profit organisation.
>From this point of view, it would seem un-needed to add more to this.
Sincerely
On 30/11/15 17:40, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> On 2015-10-13 07:22, Emmanue
On 2015-10-13 07:22, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Nemesis wrote:
>>
>> As far as I remember, there's no initiative going on, but the issue was
>> brought up at the summit by different speakers.
>>
>> There was also a quick poll:
>>
>> 1. Kathy Giori asked
2015-11-30 13:56 GMT+01:00, Rafał Miłecki :
> On 30 November 2015 at 12:47, José Vázquez Fernández
> wrote:
>> I have a Linksys E1000 with a BCM5357 SoC but the wifi is not supported in
>> b43 nor brcmsmac, and
>> bcmdhd is not an option. Will it be supported in a future?
>
> Take a look at:
> htt
This patch just extends target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile to build
images also for version 2.1 of TL-WR710N
patch against the latest git
Signed off by: Norbert Wegener
---
target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/
On 30 November 2015 at 12:47, José Vázquez Fernández
wrote:
> I have a Linksys E1000 with a BCM5357 SoC but the wifi is not supported in
> b43 nor brcmsmac, and
> bcmdhd is not an option. Will it be supported in a future?
Take a look at:
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/b43/soc
Bastian Bittorf [2015-11-30 12:01:47]:
> build testing OpenWrt can be *really* fast, if you
>
> a) build in a ram-disk
> b) use dedicated hardware for each architecture
>
> i bet it's about 300 seconds for a full fresh
> distributed build for *all* architectures.
That sounds really great, can
I have a Linksys E1000 with a BCM5357 SoC but the wifi is not supported in b43
nor brcmsmac, and
bcmdhd is not an option. Will it be supported in a future?
Regards:
José Vázquez
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://l
* Petr Štetiar [30.11.2015 11:50]:
> Did you tried to build OpenWRT image on some cloud CI? I assume, that your
> build can't take 8 hours. There's quite a lot of patches being sent to the
> mailing list so I doubt, that you can at least build check all of them on the
> cloud CIs. Is image build c
On 30 November 2015 at 17:50, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 30/11/2015 10:33, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as an intermediate solution we could simply allow qemu specific events.
>>
>> I'm with John here that passing on uevents unfiltered is probably no
>> good idea.
>>
>> ~ Jow
>
> yep,
On 30/11/2015 10:33, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as an intermediate solution we could simply allow qemu specific events.
>
> I'm with John here that passing on uevents unfiltered is probably no
> good idea.
>
> ~ Jow
yep, hence my idea about includes
we could ship a "include /etc/ho
Hello,
i think the patch fixes the issue.
We could reproduce a factory reset with the dc/dc test very often
befor we apply your patch.
But now i think there is an other problem with ubifs! See log
The system fails at Saturday evening with this error
Press the [f] key and hit [enter]
Hi all,
as an intermediate solution we could simply allow qemu specific events.
I'm with John here that passing on uevents unfiltered is probably no
good idea.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.o
bkil [2015-11-29 02:47:09]:
> Good work, guys! GitHub pull requests with cloud CI integration
> (drone.io, travis, etc.), driven by an online distributed review
> process and single click merging would really enable scaling of this
> project.
Did you tried to build OpenWRT image on some cloud CI
On 30/11/2015 09:38, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Ben West [2015-11-27 10:00:51]:
>
> Hi,
>
>> This person is reporting a new Ubiquiti AC AP where there the bootloader
>> does an RSA signature check on the firmware image.
>
> let's hope, that it would be possible to replace/patch that unfriendly U-B
Ben West [2015-11-27 10:00:51]:
Hi,
> This person is reporting a new Ubiquiti AC AP where there the bootloader
> does an RSA signature check on the firmware image.
let's hope, that it would be possible to replace/patch that unfriendly U-Boot.
> Could anyone else confirm if they've observed the
On 26 November 2015 at 18:10, Prototik wrote:
> +@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> ++/*
> ++ * Broadcom BCM470X / BCM5301X ARM platform code.
> ++ * DTS for Huawei WS880
> ++ *
> ++ * Copyright (C) 2015 Sergey Shatunov
> ++ *
> ++ * Licensed under the GNU/GPL. See COPYING for details.
> ++ */
> ++
> ++/dts-v1/;
42 matches
Mail list logo
