Dear OpenWRT-hackers,
i am from the project EDN that has the goal to increase privacy and
security for everyone's communication - especially in and by open
wireless communities.
For that reason we want to test several promising projects.
One of it is GNUnet that we aim to have running in the Batt
* Szabolcs Nagy [2015-06-24 22:57:54 +0200]:
> the bug is that mips tls access uses a hard coded -32768
> offset relative to whatever __tls_get_addr returned.
>
> and musl did not account for this offset.
>
only affects mips shared objects with 'static __thread' variables,
extern __thread vari
Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin
---
.../patches/385-ath9k_hw-fix-device-ID-check-for-AR956x.patch | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git
a/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/385-ath9k_hw-fix-device-ID-check-for-AR956x.patch
b/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/385-ath9k_hw-fix-d
* Ted Hess [2015-06-23 18:04:35 -0400]:
> Segfault in 'snd_lib_error_set_local' (error.c) referencing
> static __thread snd_local_error_handler_t local_error;
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0041b164 in snd_lib_error_set_local ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0041b164 in snd_lib_
Hi,
Le 24 juin 2015 16:19, "Steven Barth" a écrit :
>
> Hi Etienne,
>
> I don't get your issue. 46119 only unifies the override variables,
> meaning if a package maintainer wants to override e.g. RELRO he now
> only needs to add PKG_RELRO:=0 instead of adding two for both RELRO
> modes.
>
Sorry i
On 24/06/2015 16:25, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> Steven Barth wrote:
>> oldpackages are obsolete and in many instances riddled with security
>> issues.
>> They should not be used at all.
>
> Right, but that's not really relevant here. This is about packages
> which are up to date, have maintainer
Steven Barth wrote:
> oldpackages are obsolete and in many instances riddled with security
> issues.
> They should not be used at all.
Right, but that's not really relevant here. This is about packages
which are up to date, have maintainers, but are not in old packages, and
not in the for-15.05
Hi Etienne,
I don't get your issue. 46119 only unifies the override variables,
meaning if a package maintainer wants to override e.g. RELRO he now
only needs to add PKG_RELRO:=0 instead of adding two for both RELRO
modes.
Cheers,
Steven
___
openwrt-de
* Hannu Nyman [2015-06-23 22:05:54 +0300]:
> px5g-standalone: fix compilation after fortify-headers
>
> New fortify-headers functionality (default after r46117) is apparently
> conflicting with gcc "-pedantic" option. The package px5g-standalone fails
> to compile due to "error: #include_next is
Hi all,
Please reread r46119
Relro full != relro partial
Fortify source 1 != fortify source 2
Ssp != ssp strong
Regards
Etienne
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-de
10 matches
Mail list logo
