2015-04-08 0:01 GMT-06:00 Rafał Miłecki :
> WRT300N v1.0 is supported now. I did it even before CC release, hooray :)
>
> For few minutes of testing I got a nice 20-22 Mb/s transfer using b43
> driver (it doesn't support 802.11n features, so 802.11g speeds are
> available only).
Wow, that was fast
On 5 April 2015 at 01:01, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 30 March 2015 at 23:43, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 17 March 2015 at 22:05, Alex Henrie wrote:
>>> I just mailed the router. When it arrives, please send confirmation to
>>> me and to treasu...@spi-inc.org.
>>
>> I just got it today, thanks!
>>
+1
On 07.04.2015 21:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashioned
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashioned poll?
>
> Give your +1 answer on this mail if
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
xxiao
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
xxiao
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1 for Designated Driver
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, w
+1 for "Designated Driver"
On 15-04-07 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:51:11 +0200, wrote:
i am really wondering if the core devs are following this or even give a
damn. didn't read anything after John's last mail declaring Dirty
Diamond the winner. Felix, John, anybody?
Well, given I'm the one to blame for all the older names except fo
On 08.04.2015 00:45, David Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote:
>
>> On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>>
>>> Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer".
>> How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
>> anything else.
>
> There ar
On 08.04.2015 00:33, Peter Lawler wrote:
> On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>
>> Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer".
> How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
> anything else.
>
simply write your vote in the subject and have a mail bo
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer".
How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
anything else.
There are three different subthreads, each looking for answers on
On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer".
How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
anything else.
Pete.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.
On 04-04-15 14:45, shengkai wrote:
> hi Maintainer and All,
>
> We are an open source hardware team come from china, and we developed
> an open source route board using MT7620A soc. In order to support this
> new board officially, we plan to sumbit the special code for our
> prodcut to openwrt bran
+1
Hartmut Knaack hat geschrieben:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your
+1
Em ter, 7 de abr de 2015 às 18:15, Daniel Petre
escreveu:
> +1
>
> On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> >> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could
> even
> >> change or delete other votes. Since thi
+1
--
Marc Nicholas
CTO, Wimoto Technologies Inc.
Unit 2, 300 Don Park Road, Markham, Ontario L3R 3A1 CANADA
+1.416.414.6272
On April 7, 2015 at 5:11:55 PM, Daniel Golle (dan...@makrotopia.org) wrote:
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-de
+1
On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote:
+1
On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically ve
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashion
+1
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:47:35 +0200
From: Hartmut Knaack
To: edgar.sol...@web.de,
OpenWrt Development List
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or del
+1
- Original Message -
From: "edgar soldin"
To: "OpenWrt Development List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 4:10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this
weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you H
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this
weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you Hartmut will count the votes
properly, manually as seems necessary.
+1 for Designated Driver
..ede
PS: i will deactivate the flawed doodle poll now
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 a
+1
Hartmut Knaack schrieb am 07.04.2015 um 21:47:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashio
+1
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not
> have a
> goo
+1 for Designated Driver
Aaron Z
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze
+1
On 07/04/2015 16:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "
Oh, sorry, forgot to mention that. It's a custom Intel-based platform (based
on an Atom Rangeley reference design, with a PCIe Ath10k card from Compex,
based on a QCA9880).
> On Apr 7, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Irfan Zia wrote:
>
>
> Which platform ? Is it a TP-Link device ? We did some recent wo
We have an openwrt build that we're working with, that has the most recent
compat-wireless from the trunk (package/kernel/mac80211).
When we load the ath10k driver, it seems to pause for several seconds and write
out a message about not finding a particular firmware file:
[6.418730] ath10k_
None of the LEDs are enabled by default on the Hornet-UB X2 board
(the 16/64MB version of the Hornet-UB), because it uses a different
board-name ("hornet-ub-x2"); but hornet-ub and hornet-ub-x2 boards
are equivalent WRT their LEDs.
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds
==
Apparently this was actually just some confusion at Data Alliance--
looks like they may have mistakenly tried to flash some 16/64 boards
with the procedure for the 8/32 boards (which doesn't port cleanly).
I got in touch with someone at Alfa who affirmed that the only change
that they've made was
On 07/04/2015 15:50, Deepanjan Kar wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have introduced a new file in the linux-3.10.49/drivers/leds directory
> for SATA LED toggling.
>
> I however find that the callback registered for LED activity is not
> getting called.
>
> Underneath is the snippet of code and
On 07/04/2015 15:22, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> That was a bit too quick of course. Here's a small set of patches which
> should fix both errors and help debugging similar issues.
>
> Bjørn Mork (3):
> fix subscriber response segfault
> add command done status to verbose output
> avoid parsing I
Dear All,
I have introduced a new file in the linux-3.10.49/drivers/leds directory for
SATA LED toggling.
I however find that the callback registered for LED activity is not getting
called.
Underneath is the snippet of code and the function in RED is the one that I am
talking about.
I do see th
That was a bit too quick of course. Here's a small set of patches which
should fix both errors and help debugging similar issues.
Bjørn Mork (3):
fix subscriber response segfault
add command done status to verbose output
avoid parsing InformationBuffer unless status is "success"
cli.c
The MBIM specification requires that the InformationBuffer
is empty unless the status field is MBIM_STATUS_SUCCESS,
except for 4 explicit combinations of status code and
command id.
Avoid calling the reply handler if the status code is
non-zero and the information buffer is empty.
Signed-off-by:
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork
---
mbim-dev.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mbim-dev.c b/mbim-dev.c
index 4c129b0..f4b26eb 100644
--- a/mbim-dev.c
+++ b/mbim-dev.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ mbim_recv(struct uloop_fd *u, unsigned int events)
{
ssize_t cnt = rea
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork
---
cli.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cli.c b/cli.c
index e6b34d7..cb107b7 100644
--- a/cli.c
+++ b/cli.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ mbim_subscriber_response(void *buffer, int len)
if (le32toh(state->readyinfo) & MBIM_READY_INFO_F
John Crispin writes:
> On 07/04/2015 12:31, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> David Hutchison writes:
>>
>>> Hello John,
>>>
>>> One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware
>>> revision that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
>>> http://mtekk.us/archives/guides/netgear-aircard-3
John Crispin writes:
> On 07/04/2015 12:31, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> David Hutchison writes:
>>
>>> Hello John,
>>>
>>> One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware
>>> revision that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
>>> http://mtekk.us/archives/guides/netgear-aircard-
On 07/04/2015 12:31, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> David Hutchison writes:
>
>> Hello John,
>>
>> One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware
>> revision that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
>> http://mtekk.us/archives/guides/netgear-aircard-340u-linux/ ) We
>> had to dow
Hi Martin,
thanks for diggin' in the proprietary dirt and extracting all the
legally possible info for each firmware file.
I also got some VRX200 boards flying around here, most of them in
productive use on VDSL2 lines. However, I might give your updated
driver a try once I'm awake during less cri
David Hutchison writes:
> Hello John,
>
> One of our customers use the 340U, and the latest firmware revision
> that fixes Windows 8 support.. broke linux support (
> http://mtekk.us/archives/guides/netgear-aircard-340u-linux/ ) We had
> to downgrade the firmware on the 340u itself.
Is this brok
ok, took the freedom to set up another vote, incl. the third option. let's see
what the numbers say in a few days.
http://doodle.com/9d262b569bh4r7kv
it'd make sense that everybody retakes the vote to have the truest election
result.
regards ..ede
__
49 matches
Mail list logo
