On Nov 28, 2014 3:24 PM, "Weedy" wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2014 5:23 AM, "Heiner Kallweit" wrote:
> > Anybody with a 8216-based device who can test this?
>
> Me me me, me me.
> 4300 currently running trunk with 43332 reverted.
> I am at your service.
Is the current trunk fixed? You never replied a
ADD some kirkwood FDT
- SheevaPlug
- SheevaPlug with eSATA
- GuruplugServerPlus
- Topkick1281P2
Signed-off-by: Gérald Kerma
---
target/linux/kirkwood/image/Makefile | 12 +
target/linux/kirkwood/profiles/120-plug.mk | 80 ++
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
KIRKWOOD : add sheevaplug and derivatives
ADD some kirkwood FDT
- SheevaPlug
- SheevaPlug with eSATA
- GuruplugServerPlus
- Topkick1281P2
With (CC) TRUNK OpenWRT build (QUICK HOWTO) :
### INITIALIZE
Marvell>> nand erase.part root
### PREPARE
M
applied, thanks.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
On 17 December 2014 at 02:02, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would prefer to make it configurable like libcurl, busybox and others so
> select the option you need during compile.
> Base inside OpenWrt should be without any options, because dnsmasq is only
> used as IPv4 DHCP.
>
>
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
---
package/network/services/dnsmasq/Makefile | 27 ++--
.../network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init|5
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/network/services/dnsmasq/Makefile
b/package/net
On 12/16/2014 07:35 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Does it really look for entries in /etc/config/fstab? Or does it
> hardcode to use "rootfs" / "rootfs_data" partitions? Could you explain
> what's the point of all these
> find_block_mtd("rootfs", fs, sizeof(fs));
> find_block_ubi_RO(libubi, "rootfs",
The config-3.10 got removed in r43632, so bye-bye to patches-3.10 as well.
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek
---
.../ar7/patches-3.10/001-mips-ar7-fix-serial.patch | 28 --
target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/110-flash.patch | 22 --
.../linux/ar7/patches-3.10/120-gpio_chrdev.patch | 28 --
.../pat
On 16 December 2014 at 16:06, Gergely Kiss wrote:
> So, is this simply about mounting an additional UBIFS partition at boot time?
>
> If so, I believe the best solution would be to extend the
> functionality of fstab with a simple (shell) script, as suggested in
> the fstab wiki:
>
> "BTRFS, JFS,
On 16 December 2014 at 16:30, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:06:27 +0100, Gergely Kiss
> wrote:
>> On 16 December 2014 at 14:39, Flávio Silveira wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16/12/2014 11:23, Gergely Kiss wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Are there any devices
out t
Hi,
I would prefer to make it configurable like libcurl, busybox and others so
select the option you need during compile.
Base inside OpenWrt should be without any options, because dnsmasq is only used
as IPv4 DHCP.
Have you ever check the funny thing happen, if you select more than 1 (*)
insi
Hi,
to be able to build dnsmasq with DNS auth and/or IPSET and/or DNSSEC
support people are currently forced to enable the whole IPv6 stuff.
Current package layout:
dnsmasq: ---
dnsmasq-dhcpv6: +DHCPv6 (depends on IPv6)
dnsmasq-full: +DNS auth, +IPSET, +DHCPv6, +DNSSEC (depends on IPv6)
Build si
On 2014-12-14 00:41, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Some devices have uImage headers after some extra headers (e.g. Edimax
> devices). To support such cases our verify callback function should be
> allowed to return header offset, not just a boolean value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
> ---
> Hi Toma
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:06:27 +0100, Gergely Kiss wrote:
Please don't top-post.
Sorry, I haven't read that post earlier.
So, is this simply about mounting an additional UBIFS partition at boot time?
If so, I believe the best solution would be to extend the
functionality of fstab with a simple
Sorry, I haven't read that post earlier.
So, is this simply about mounting an additional UBIFS partition at boot time?
If so, I believe the best solution would be to extend the
functionality of fstab with a simple (shell) script, as suggested in
the fstab wiki:
"BTRFS, JFS, *UBI* [...] are not s
Take a look at this patch:
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/6751/
First of all you need to find your router's board id.
If changing the board id CFE works then you have a some kind of solution.
2014-12-16 9:26 GMT+01:00, Eugene :
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to add support for Sagemcom F@ST2804V
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas
wrote:
Please add a description for your bindings in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
> ---
> v2: use vendor for DT properties.
>
> diff --git a/target/linux/brcm63xx/config-3.14
> b/target/li
On 16/12/2014 11:23, Gergely Kiss wrote:
Hi Rafał,
please allow me to comment on your 2nd point as I was the one who
recently published the patch to make extroot functionality work with
UBIFS.
"It seems that if there isn't "rootfs" MTD partition,
then the code will look for "rootfs" UBI volume
Hi Rafał,
please allow me to comment on your 2nd point as I was the one who
recently published the patch to make extroot functionality work with
UBIFS.
"It seems that if there isn't "rootfs" MTD partition,
then the code will look for "rootfs" UBI volume. The same applies to
the "rootfs_data"."
T
Felix Fietkau writes:
> > As far as binutils is concerned the patch below seems to work as expected,
> > so I can now add my
> > Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer
> >
> > Felix, can you take this as is or should I resend the patch?
> Removing libgcc_pic.a and adding libgcc.a makes sense to me.
> You c
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2014-12-12 6:33 GMT-08:00 Jonas Gorski :
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2014 15:12, Jonas Gorski wrote:
or the gpio-base problem, we should be able to register appropriate
platform d
applied, thanks.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> 1/5
> Remove unused function parameter in ar8327_led_register
>
> 2/5
> Factor out chip-specific parameters from ar8xxx_probe_switch
>
> 3/5
> Create helpers mii_read32 / mii_write32 for 32 bit MII ops.
>
> 4/5
> Remove read/write/rmw membe
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 07:50:52PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> > Ok, I think most of it is because of options enabled by default. I
>> > wonder why that happens, but I also wonder why it hasn't been picked
>> > up by my tests.
>>
>> I alrea
Signed-off-by: Russell Senior
---
package/network/utils/iproute2/Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/network/utils/iproute2/Makefile
b/package/network/utils/iproute2/Makefile
index f6d2801..9aea05e 100644
--- a/package/network/utils/iproute2/
I've spent few hours today trying to understand extroot. I've failed :(
Of course I was trying to use wiki pages:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/extroot
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/fstab
1) Main question
Is the following sentence true at all?
> The configuration of extroot is very simple a
On 2014-12-12 16:21, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Even though we always build all the board images for a given target, some
> options widely differ from one board to another when it comes to hardware
> configuration.
>
> Such an option for example is the NAND setup, which depends on the NAND chip
> itse
On 16 December 2014 at 16:28, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 15 December 2014 at 16:46, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
>> ---
>> +static void uci_show_value(struct uci_option *o, bool quote)
>> {
>> struct uci_element *e;
>> bool sep = false;
>>
>> switc
On 15 December 2014 at 16:46, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
> ---
> cli.c | 40 ++--
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cli.c b/cli.c
> index 6fbbfe9..85a24d8 100644
> --- a/cli.c
> +++ b/cli.c
> @@ -16
Hello,
Is it possible to add support for Sagemcom F@ST2804V7 ?
I tried openwr...@st2704v2-squashfs-cfe.bin and some others
(barrier_breaker) on it,
bootlog (via serial port) says: Kernel panic - not syncing: unable to
detect bcm963xx board.
If it is possible, i will supply all required informati
30 matches
Mail list logo
