Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> Note that babeld is maintained in https://github.com/openwrt-routing/packages.
> Nevertheless, comments inline.
So I found, after I had sent this off. In future I'll send pull-requests
there.
>> adds a hotplug.d file to restart babeld when interfaces go up or down.
>
>
Hi again Felix,
Am Di, 9.09.2014, 22:20 schrieb Mathias Adam:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Am Di, 9.09.2014, 21:32 schrieb Felix Fietkau:
>> On 2014-09-09 21:21, Mathias Adam wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> just noticed that the pre-built image for Huawei E970 (brcm47xx-legacy,
>>> openwrt-e970-squashfs-gz.bin) is too
From: Weijie Gao
Qihoo 360 C301 is a dual band wireless router supports 802.11n and 802.11ac.
Its chipset is AR9344 + AR9882 with two 16MB flashes.
This patch adds its initial support.
Signed-off-by: Weijie Gao
---
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 3 +
.../ar71xx/base-fi
On 2014-09-10 16:41, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:31:37PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
>> One more thing/optimization I was thinking of is, instead
>> of modifying the destination address of the frame whether the
>> 802.11 receiver address could be modified. For instance by lett
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:31:37PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> One more thing/optimization I was thinking of is, instead
> of modifying the destination address of the frame whether the
> 802.11 receiver address could be modified. For instance by letting
> the bridge forward the destinations to ma
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:49:18PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2014-09-10 05:41, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > Hi Felix,
> >
> > Matthias just told me about the work you have done on the bridge
> > code which can be found as 645-bridge_multicast_to_unicast.patch
> > in the OpenWRT repositord.
> >
On 2014-09-10 05:41, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Matthias just told me about the work you have done on the bridge
> code which can be found as 645-bridge_multicast_to_unicast.patch
> in the OpenWRT repositord.
>
> I really like the idea of unicasting multicast packets to STAs.
> Especial
I just got a complaint about bridges, multicast and a
3.10 kernel again. Seems like nobody had any objections about
queueing these two patches for stable ( 2)+3) )?
Also I'm still missing some more fixes in the stable branches.
Especially 5), 6) and 7) are of high priority (next to 2) and 3) )
in
On 2014-09-02 12:14, Petar Koretic wrote:
> With this patch WPS discovery can be started or canceled over ubus if
> WPS is enabled in wireless configuration. This is equivalent of
> 'hostapd_cli wps_pbc' and 'hostapd_cli wps_cancel' commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petar Koretic
Committed in r42459,
This patch completes missing help text for some options under CONFIG_DEVEL.
Provides help for BINARY_FOLDER and DOWNLOAD_FOLDER, and reduces ambiguity in
the help for BUILD_SUFFIX with an example.
Signed-off-by: Andrew McDonnell
---
Patch resend; this time with tab characters fixed and a compone
2014-09-10 15:36 GMT+04:00, Jiri Slaby :
> On 09/10/2014, 12:33 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>> 2014-09-09 22:27 GMT+04:00, John W. Linville :
>>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
2014-09-05 15:33 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle :
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On Fri, 2014-09
Hi,
patch is whitespace broken. please fix and resend
John
On 09/09/2014 20:28, Weijie Gao wrote:
> Add Qihoo 360 C301 router support
>
> Signed-off-by: Weijie Gao
> ---
>
> The hardware of Qihoo 360 C301 router is AR9344 + AR9882
> with 128MB RAM and two 16MB flashes.
>
> The sysupgrade f
2014-09-09 22:27 GMT+04:00, John W. Linville :
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>> 2014-09-05 15:33 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle :
>> > Hi Sergey,
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:12 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>> >> 2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle :
>> >> > On
Non-functional edits to toolchain/Config.in:
* fix spelling mistake ("us" -> "is")
* Overly long help lines shortened to avoid line wrap
* Standardize help info to use tab(s), then two spaces
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
---
i hope no one objects to my patches which are simply aesthetic
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 10 September 2014 09:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > so, to clarify.
> >
> > * package-related issues go to github?
> > * target-related issues go to trac?
>
> That's mostly correct.
>
> There are still some special packages (like uci, fstools, ipt
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 10 September 2014 09:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > so, to clarify.
> >
> > * package-related issues go to github?
> > * target-related issues go to trac?
>
> That's mostly correct.
>
> There are still some special packages (like uci, fstools, ipt
On 10 September 2014 09:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> so, to clarify.
>
> * package-related issues go to github?
> * target-related issues go to trac?
That's mostly correct.
There are still some special packages (like uci, fstools, iptables,
etc.) that are part of OpenWrt repository and proble
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 10 September 2014 09:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/devel/bugs
> >
> > which, as it turns out, gave me completely outdated and incorrect
> > instructions on how to open a ticket
>
> What's so completely outdated there?
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 10 September 2014 09:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >
> >> On 10 September 2014 08:36, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> > i erroneously submitted a target-related bug report to the packages
> >> > bug track
On 10 September 2014 09:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/devel/bugs
>
> which, as it turns out, gave me completely outdated and incorrect
> instructions on how to open a ticket
What's so completely outdated there?
___
openwrt-d
On 10 September 2014 09:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
>> On 10 September 2014 08:36, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> > i erroneously submitted a target-related bug report to the packages
>> > bug tracker. where is the proper place to submit such an issue?
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 10 September 2014 08:36, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i erroneously submitted a target-related bug report to the packages
> > bug tracker. where is the proper place to submit such an issue?
> > thanks.
>
> Have you heard about http://google.com/ ? T
On 10 September 2014 08:36, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i erroneously submitted a target-related bug report to the packages
> bug tracker. where is the proper place to submit such an issue?
> thanks.
Have you heard about http://google.com/ ? Try "openwrt bug reports".
23 matches
Mail list logo
