Hi, I build image with default configuration and follow instructions on web:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/recipes/routedclient#using.masquerade
rt5350 fails to connect to other ap. The log printed as follow:
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not read Does th
I Just got a tplink wr881n couple days ago,which is qca9558 plus ar8236
You can check the inside looks here:
http://forum.anywlan.com/thread-271726-1-1.html
I want to see openwrt running on this platform. I tried flash wr1043nd-v2
image into it,seeing that wireless is ok.
Then I happen to see a gu
Hi,
i just pushed an update that adds explicit tone profiles and allows
setting the xtse bits for v/adsl separately.
Hope this make the modem work for more people in more environments
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.open
Well its also not a pressing issue for me. I just wanted to report it so it ends
up on a TODO list ;).
Henning
> Steven Barth hat am 9. April 2014 um 12:28 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Henning,
>
> yeah that is another side-effect of your - well - "irregular"
> ISP-behaviour. I will try to put it on th
* Imre Kaloz [09.04.2014 14:53]:
> Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't
> have a board to do anymore ;)
ok, will do some more tests and send a patch with re-enables it.
(board will run in our testnet)
bye, bastian
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:39:04 +0200, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
why is it marked as 'broken'? i just compiled it with
trunk r40422/kernel 3.10.34 and it boots fine.
Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't have
a board to do anymore ;)
Imre
why is it marked as 'broken'? i just compiled it with
trunk r40422/kernel 3.10.34 and it boots fine.
bye, bastian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Michel Stempin
wrote:
> Does it mean that ther ewill be a new AA binary release, or just the sources
> will be updated?
I too would like to know the answer to this question. The AA sources
have been updated but opkg update + upgrade finds no new version.
_
On 2014-04-09 13:14, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Yeoh Chun-Yeow writes:
>
>>> Could someone confirm if WDS and adhoc mode currently don't have support
>>> with this driver?
>>
>> adhoc is working but not perfect, such as rate control not working, no
>> HT/VHT rate, and etc. You need to use the firmware
Gert Doering writes:
> There has been quite a bit of discussion in the ISP camp regarding WAN
> IPv6 addresses. It's not actually straightforward what to do as an ISP,
> so multiple variants exist
>
> - RA for WAN, DHCPv6-PD for LAN
> disadvantage: on PPPoE-type deployments, you need two pr
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:23:30 Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2014-04-09 13:10, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2014 11:59:24 Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >>total <= 1, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must match,
> >>radar
> >
> > What it mean "STA/AP
On 2014-04-09 13:10, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2014 11:59:24 Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>total <= 1, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must match, radar
>
> What it mean "STA/AP BI must match" ?
Must use the same beacon interval.
- Felix
_
Yeoh Chun-Yeow writes:
>> Could someone confirm if WDS and adhoc mode currently don't have support
>> with this driver?
>
> adhoc is working but not perfect, such as rate control not working, no
> HT/VHT rate, and etc. You need to use the firmware version
> 999.999.0.636.
>
> WDS should be worki
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 11:59:24 Felix Fietkau wrote:
>total <= 1, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must match, radar
What it mean "STA/AP BI must match" ?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt
Hi Henning,
yeah that is another side-effect of your - well - "irregular"
ISP-behaviour. I will try to put it on the TODO but it's not very high
on the list as its more or less cosmetic, sorry I'm a little short on
time at the moment.
Cheers,
Steven
Hi Gert,
There has been quite a bit of discussion in the ISP camp regarding WAN
IPv6 addresses. It's not actually straightforward what to do as an ISP,
so multiple variants exist
- RA for WAN, DHCPv6-PD for LAN
- DHCPv6-IA for WAN, DHCPv6-PD for LAN
- "require use of an IPv6 addre
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
> Hi Gert,
> >>i find it very strange that your ISP doesn't offer public addresses on
> >>the WAN interface however I think this is actually standards compliant
> >>so we have to deal with it.
> >It's called "IPv4 exhaustion"... DS
17 matches
Mail list logo
