Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] radsecproxy procd conversion

2014-03-09 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Also, since radsecproxy will fail to start if it can't resolve the host it is configured to contact, it really should be moved up to START=70 rather than the current START=50. Did not include this in the patch because it's a separate issue; can resubmit if needed, or submit a separate patch for the

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] radsecproxy procd conversion

2014-03-09 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
This patch converts the radsecproxy init script to use procd. Works for me, but not sure if the stop_service part is entirely idiomatic (omitting it breaks things, though)... -Toke diff --git a/net/radsecproxy/files/radsecproxy.init b/net/radsecproxy/files/radsecproxy.init index b1b4f8e..b551f0

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add ip-full variant to disable IP_CONFIG_TINY

2014-03-09 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2014-02-27 12:32, Thomas Wouters wrote: > This change creates a new ip-full variant for the ip package. > It disables IP_CONFIG_TINY to make some iproute2 features available like > xfrm, gretap, ... > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Wouters Applied with minor modifications in r39854 Thanks, - Felix

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openssl: Fix x86_64 build on some 64bit host systems

2014-03-09 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2014-02-28 10:38, Helmut Schaa wrote: > On some build hosts openssl fails to install since openssl installs itself > into > lib64 while the openwrt Makefile expects the libs to end up in lib. > > install -m0644 > .../openwrt/build_dir/target-x86_64_uClibc-0.9.33.2/openssl-1.0.1e/ipkg-install/

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openssl 1.0.1f patch

2014-03-09 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2014-03-05 21:03, Peter Wagner wrote: > Update openssl to 1.0.1f > > This version includes this changes: > > Don't include gmt_unix_time in TLS server and client random values > Fix for TLS record tampering bug CVE-2013-4353 > Fix for TLS version checking bug CVE-2013-6449 > Fi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Correct use of basic_rate parameter for ath9k / 802.11n?

2014-03-09 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2014-03-08 05:09, Ben West wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. The basic rates vs. supported rates were > a bit ambiguous to me. My underlying motivation was to disable lower > 2.4GHz bitrates, i.e. 1 through 5.5Mbit/s, to conserve airtime. Is such > a hotplug script nevertheless the best