Hi Diego,
I am not familiar with the command you mentioned, i test this patch use the
LuCI.
Just as what you said in the mail, now the AP and STA mode can work
together.
But i found that when i open AP mode first, then the scan function is
invalid.
I must disable the WIFI first, then click the sca
Hi,
I am also interested in this feature and I've tried your patch, jonsmirl.
It seems to work fine, thanks! I haven't tested it that much, but no
functional problems so far.
I have another question. I've noticed that, in AP+STA mode, the AP is
switched off when the STA is not connected. I would
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:45:26AM -0500, James Hilliard wrote:
> I thought DD-WRT was only using public tarball drivers.I looked through
> their source and everything seems to match up with tarbar type wl.o files
> and so on.
Try building from their public source.
Half of the relevant bro
On 2013-09-18 12:45 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> I thought DD-WRT was only using public tarball drivers.I looked through
> their source and everything seems to match up with tarbar type wl.o
> files and so on.
That's what the build system of the Broadcom driver generates. There's a
reason why the dr
I thought DD-WRT was only using public tarball drivers.I looked through
their source and everything seems to match up with tarbar type wl.o files
and so on.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2013-09-18 12:31 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> > Aren't all the other router proj
On 2013-09-18 12:31 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> Aren't all the other router projects using the broadcom-wl binary's
> generally sourced from GPL tarballs? although not necessarily the exact
> matching ones? DD-WRT and tomato all use broadcom-wl, but I think they
> use versions that are at least som
Aren't all the other router projects using the broadcom-wl binary's
generally sourced from GPL tarballs? although not necessarily the exact
matching ones? DD-WRT and tomato all use broadcom-wl, but I think they use
versions that are at least somewhat devices specific unlike OpenWRT which
seems to b
On 2013-09-17 11:45 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> Following up on this I'm trying to figure out how broadcom-wl is set up
> in openwrt and what devices specific variables there are how those would
> be changed/determined. I'm trying to fix compatibility problems with
> this driver for a lot of broadc
