Update ehci/ohci driver registration to conform to the new platform
drivers.
This fixes missing USB host support in 3.8.x
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
.../cns3xxx/files/arch/arm/mach-cns3xxx/laguna.c | 54 ++-
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
I believe the answer is to select the Default target and then all of
these rt30xx variations get built in
build_dir/target-mipsel_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-ramips_rt305x/*
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:19 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm trying to get a build going for an old WS-WN512N1. It is support
Add support for TPLINK WR720N v3 which has 4MB flash, 32MB ram, 2 ethernet
interfaces, 1 USB 2.0 port. The patch is mostly a modification from
mach-tl-wr703n.c. GPIO numbers for the slider switch is from mach-tl-mr3020n.c.
Tested on my device and they worked fine.
Signed-off-by: yousong
---
t
Hi,
I have noticed a bit of development for the Linksys WRT320N, However no
OpenWRT release for it.
This router has:
BCM4716 @ 354Mhz
4x Gigabit LAN 1x Gigabit WAN, BCM47XX
Dual Band 2.4/5.8Ghz Wifi
32Mb Ram
8Mb Flash
Any idea on a release that will work on this device? I have 3 of them, Happy
I'm trying to get a build going for an old WS-WN512N1. It is supported
as a WR512-3NG.
How do I configure for this board? It is not a target under RT3050.
But I can see the support files for WR512-3NG in the tree. It is
getting built in the downloads..
http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Michel Stempin
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Le 09/04/2013 21:13, jonsm...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> Does any one actually have one of the TopLink minPCIe boards? Their
>> datasheet doesn't clearly identify the pins. They have pins called
>> LINK1, LINK2, LINK3, LINK4. It is n
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Michel Stempin
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Le 09/04/2013 21:13, jonsm...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> Does any one actually have one of the TopLink minPCIe boards? Their
>> datasheet doesn't clearly identify the pins. They have pins called
>> LINK1, LINK2, LINK3, LINK4. It is n
Hi John,
Le 09/04/2013 21:13, jonsm...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Does any one actually have one of the TopLink minPCIe boards? Their
> datasheet doesn't clearly identify the pins. They have pins called
> LINK1, LINK2, LINK3, LINK4. It is not clear what those pins do. They
> only expose two of the Ethe
Does any one actually have one of the TopLink minPCIe boards? Their
datasheet doesn't clearly identify the pins. They have pins called
LINK1, LINK2, LINK3, LINK4. It is not clear what those pins do. They
only expose two of the Ethernet ports so there is no need for four
link status pins.
I think f
Does any one actually have one of the TopLink minPCIe boards? Their
datasheet doesn't clearly identify the pins. They have pins called
LINK1, LINK2, LINK3, LINK4. It is not clear what those pins do. They
only expose two of the Ethernet ports so there is no need for four
link status pins.
On Mon, A
Le 04/04/13 12:56, Michel Stempin a écrit :
Le 27/02/2013 13:46, Jonas Gorski a écrit :
On 27 February 2013 13:25, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
On 01/31/2013 11:25 AM, Michel Stempin wrote:
Hi John,
Le 31/01/2013 09:07, John Crispin a écrit :
Hi,
please also send this patch upstrea
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> Le 04/09/13 10:08, Helmut Schaa a écrit :
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa
>> ---
>>
>> Or should we just enable all boards that are available in mainline instead
>> of enabling them one by one?
>
>
> One by one sounds like there w
Shouldn't parallel NOR flash work too? There is a second RAM chip
select. Nobody uses it because it is more expensive.
Yes, it should. But rt5350 can boot only from spi flash.
Best regards.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.o
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 01:24 AM, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
>> I am missing some more flash though. 8MB is just enough, but it seems
>> like RT5350 chipset does not support more.
>
> NACK. We got Rt5350 boards with 32MB NOR (ALL5003, Art.Nr.92763).
That m
Le 04/09/13 10:08, Helmut Schaa a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa
---
Or should we just enable all boards that are available in mainline instead
of enabling them one by one?
One by one sounds like there will be some kind of live testing at least,
while if we enable them all it sounds
How about reaching to people on social networks. I bet that most of
them don't know that you need hadrware... and some of them would
donate some probably.
I just did a quick search for people discussing 802.11ac and openwrt
in Google+ and found some really prominent people, like Linus Torwalds
and
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa
---
target/linux/mpc85xx/image/Makefile |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/mpc85xx/image/Makefile
b/target/linux/mpc85xx/image/Makefile
index 40db1df..a5db79e 100644
--- a/target/linux/mpc85xx/image/Makefile
+++ b/targ
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa
---
Or should we just enable all boards that are available in mainline instead
of enabling them one by one?
Thanks,
Helmut
target/linux/mpc85xx/config-3.8 |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/mpc85xx/config-3.8 b/targe
18 matches
Mail list logo
