In case it matters, my /etc/config/wireless contains:
config wifi-device 'radio0'
option type 'mac80211'
option channel '11'
option hwmode '11ng'
option path 'platform/ar934x_wmac'
option htmode 'HT20'
list ht_capab 'LDPC'
list ht_capab 'SHORT-GI-20'
list ht_capab 'SHORT-GI-40'
list ht_capab 'TX-S
Marek,
so I built r35506 and flashed my OM2P-HS with it. As before booting the
device work fine (which is different than what Petr observed).
But when I enable wifi, dmesg shows:
[ 132.56] br-lan: port 2(wlan0) entered forwarding state
[ 132.66] [ cut here ]
[
Bastian,
When I do "swapon -p 0 /dev/zram0". I get the following output.
swapon: /dev/zram0: Function not implemented.
I tried selecting kernel modules->[*] kmod-ramzswap and see if it makes any
difference. But it still does not show up in "free". The output of free is
as follows.
root@OpenWrt:/e
Marek Lindner [2013-03-07 03:50:39]:
> I am currently using trunk r35506
Ah ok, I was talking about AA (it's not a trunk, it's a branch for a next
release - Attitude Adjustement). Will take a look at the differencies with a
trunk
then. Thanks.
-- ynezz
_
On 06.03.2013 20:48, Aaron Z wrote:
Out of curiosity, what kind of throughput do you see on the wired and
N wireless connections? Now that I see these, I may also replace the
WRT150N and DIR-601 that I am running (both running OpenWRT) with
something that will handle higher throughput.
Not sure
Thanks. I will try this later today on my hardware and report the results.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2013 11:50 AM, "Marek Lindner" wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 22:51:15 Paul van Gool wrote:
> > what SVN branch and revision are you using? I can switch to that for now.
>
> I am currently using tru
Il 05/03/2013 00:56, Conor O'Gorman ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 15:55 +0100, Luca Dariz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm trying to build the kernel with tracing support for a lantiq target
>> on svn r35820.
>> I enabled tracing options in menuconfig (Global build settings) and
>> it's ok,
>> but if
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 22:51:15 Paul van Gool wrote:
> what SVN branch and revision are you using? I can switch to that for now.
I am currently using trunk r35506:
$ cat /etc/openwrt_version
r35506
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type : Atheros AR9341 rev 1
machine
On 6 Mar 2013 at 2:35:44 PM"Gert Doering" wrote:
> In that case, make this a "+5", at least :-) - more RAM, more Flash,
> GigE switch, faster CPU, ...
> There's really no reason for a 54GL anymore, unless you specifically
> need
> *that* hardware, for example because you have a highly customized
>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:29:30PM -0500, Aaron Z wrote:
> Thanks all, we will be going with the TL-WR1043ND to allow for some
> future-proofing. Its currently the same price as a WRT54GL through Amazon so
> it will fit well in the budget.
In that case, make this a "+5", at least :-) - more
Thanks all, we will be going with the TL-WR1043ND to allow for some
future-proofing. Its currently the same price as a WRT54GL through Amazon so it
will fit well in the budget.
Thanks again
Aaron Z
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.op
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:22:46 +0200, wrote:
+1 on the 1043ND.
If you do not need 5GHz WiFi, this is a really good buy. Using them with
various versions of OpenWRT as 1wire hub, OpenVPN client, server, 3G router
(using an USB UMTS dongle, with OpenVPN and IPv6 over OpenVPN), ...
out of inter
On 06.03.2013 19:40, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:33:44PM +0100, a...@mykolab.com wrote:
>> The TL-WR841ND may very well be a good choice. You can also consider
>> the TL-WR1043ND, it has solid support (I have had about four of them and
>> tested rather heavily over t
On 06.03.2013 16:01, Aaron Z wrote:
We have about 50 WRT54GL wireless access points in ~40 libraries
which act as access points to serve up 2 wireless networks (an
encrypted staff one and a unencrypted public one for patron use (using
WiFiDog auth/stats)).
We have installed all of the 54GLs that
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:33:44PM +0100, a...@mykolab.com wrote:
> The TL-WR841ND may very well be a good choice. You can also consider
> the TL-WR1043ND, it has solid support (I have had about four of them and
> tested rather heavily over time). It is probably the best tested OpenWrt
> su
Hi Felix,
Felix Fietkau wrote,
> > Index: include/host-build.mk
> > ===
> > --- include/host-build.mk (revision 35879)
> > +++ include/host-build.mk (working copy)
> > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
> >
> > HOST_MAKE_FLAGS =
> >
> > -HOST
Hi Bastian,
I tried the revisions 35863-35865 but I can't see zram under make
menuconfig->base system when the Target System is Atheros AR231X. Zram
option shows up for the target system AR7XXX but I'm working with AR231X.
Any comments or suggestions?
Regards,
Siva.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:39 P
We have about 50 WRT54GL wireless access points in ~40 libraries which act as
access points to serve up 2 wireless networks (an encrypted staff one and a
unencrypted public one for patron use (using WiFiDog auth/stats)).
We have installed all of the 54GLs that we bought a few years back and I am
On 2013-03-06 10:45 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to work on a better BSD support as a host system
> for OpenWrt. Here is my first patch which fixes a lot of compile
> errors on OpenBSD.
>
> What you think about this patch?
Approach mostly looks OK, some comments below:
>
Make LEDs work on RB750
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds
===
--- target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds (revision 35594)
+++ target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds (worki
Marek Lindner [2013-03-06 17:14:36]:
> Looks like a regression to me because it works[tm] for me. Is this the first
> time you try to use OpenWrt on this device ? Did it ever work for you ?
Yes, it's for the first time I'm trying to run OWRT on it. Paul seems to have
the same issue[1] on trunk
This patch bumps owfs version to 2.8p21.
It also includes a patch which fixes broken compilation when HA7Net
support is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Jurkowski
---
Index: utils/owfs/Makefile
===
--- utils/owfs/Makefile (revision 3
Owfs shared library is quite large (700+ kB) by embedded devices standards.
The code for many different bus master and slave devices is compiled
into single big .so library. Had it been designed as modular,
dynamic-loadable plugins, we could split them into separate packages,
allowing user to insta
Owfs daemons lack control scripts. This patch adds init.d scripts for owfs,
owserver, owhttpd and owftpd packages.
Most daemon options (both common libow and program-specific parameters)
are reflected as uci config variables.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Jurkowski
---
Index: utils/owfs/Makefile
==
Hi,
I would like to work on a better BSD support as a host system
for OpenWrt. Here is my first patch which fixes a lot of compile
errors on OpenBSD.
What you think about this patch?
best regards
Waldemar
Index: tools/e2fsprogs/patches/003-openbsd-compat.patch
=
On Saturday, March 02, 2013 06:39:06 Petr Štetiar wrote:
> (here it hangs and waits for a watchdog timeout)
>
> I wonder if it's a known problem or if I'm the only one affected (I
> couldn't find anything like this in the Trac).
Looks like a regression to me because it works[tm] for me. Is this
(Adding openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org in the mail loop).
Paul van Gool [2013-03-05 18:29:10]:
> Petr,
Hi,
> I'm not a member of openwrt-devel mailing list but wanted to let you know I
> am seeing the same thing.
thank you for the information, now I at least know, that it's not happening
jus
27 matches
Mail list logo
