Thanks for the answer.
So I guess it would be wise to bundle it when doing a backport there like
r34084 was.
But there is no general rule or guideline when to backport (or which ones
are mandatory). More an individual decision just made case by case?
On Mo, 19.11.2012, 11:03, Florian Fainelli wr
Hi, Daniel
This version work on dir-620 d1.
19.11.2012, 22:27, "Daniel Golle" :
> Now it should really work, please test and ack' if it finally does the job.
> (I still don't have any such hardware to test)
>
> --
>
> Add function rt2800_probe_clk which detects if 20MHz clock is used on WiSoCs
>
Now it should really work, please test and ack' if it finally does the job.
(I still don't have any such hardware to test)
--
Add function rt2800_probe_clk which detects if 20MHz clock is used on WiSoCs
via rt2x00_platform_data. This is then used in rt2800_probe_hw_mode to decide
whether to use r
On Sunday 18 November 2012 16:50:32 Alexander Stadler wrote:
> Nobody here to answer the rather simple question? (see below)
I don't think these patches are important enough to trigger a kernel rebuild
for all AA targets, but that is just my opinion.
>
> On Sa, 10.11.2012, 19:15, Alexander Stadl