Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] What are the criterias for backports into attitude_adjustment? (2)

2012-11-19 Thread Alexander Stadler
Thanks for the answer. So I guess it would be wise to bundle it when doing a backport there like r34084 was. But there is no general rule or guideline when to backport (or which ones are mandatory). More an individual decision just made case by case? On Mo, 19.11.2012, 11:03, Florian Fainelli wr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2 v5] mac80211/rt2x00: add rf_vals for Rt3352 with Xtal=20MHz

2012-11-19 Thread Сергей Василюгин
Hi, Daniel This version work on dir-620 d1. 19.11.2012, 22:27, "Daniel Golle" : > Now it should really work, please test and ack' if it finally does the job. > (I still don't have any such hardware to test) > > -- > > Add function rt2800_probe_clk which detects if 20MHz clock is used on WiSoCs >

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2 v5] mac80211/rt2x00: add rf_vals for Rt3352 with Xtal=20MHz

2012-11-19 Thread Daniel Golle
Now it should really work, please test and ack' if it finally does the job. (I still don't have any such hardware to test) -- Add function rt2800_probe_clk which detects if 20MHz clock is used on WiSoCs via rt2x00_platform_data. This is then used in rt2800_probe_hw_mode to decide whether to use r

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] What are the criterias for backports into attitude_adjustment? (2)

2012-11-19 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Sunday 18 November 2012 16:50:32 Alexander Stadler wrote: > Nobody here to answer the rather simple question? (see below) I don't think these patches are important enough to trigger a kernel rebuild for all AA targets, but that is just my opinion. > > On Sa, 10.11.2012, 19:15, Alexander Stadl