On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:24:03PM -0300, Guillermo Senna wrote:
>I can't apply the patch. I tried using patch -p1 and also using git apply.
>Did you check current subversion before making the patch?
Sorry, the whitespace in the patch is mangled. However, it (and the
others in the set) will apply
Hi,
I can't apply the patch. I tried using patch -p1 and also using git apply.
Did you check current subversion before making the patch?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-deve
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 06:36:11PM -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
> Hi. Just curious, did you submit this patch to busybox guys?
No, mostly because it's 01:38 am here and I'm not sure about
current status of busybox upstream, you know, internet is full of
rumors about forks an lawsuits ;-)
I've seen t
Hi. Just curious, did you submit this patch to busybox guys?
Em 06/09/2012 18:29, "Alexey I. Froloff" escreveu:
> When running as KVM or Xen guest, packets may be received with
> incomplete checksum[1]. Patch adopted from Fedora dhcp package.
>
> [1]. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/
Folks,
Ive been playing around a bit with OpenWRT and dual stack IPv6 on my router
utilizing the tunnelbroker service. The more I dig into it, Ive struggled
to figure out what the recommended mechanism is.
Right now, I have it configured with Radvd. But I could have also used
dnsmasq to do ip
When running as KVM or Xen guest, packets may be received with
incomplete checksum[1]. Patch adopted from Fedora dhcp package.
[1]. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1003853
Signed-off-by: Alexey I. Froloff
---
package/busybox/patches/950-partial-checksum.patch | 87 +++
Folks,
Ive been playing around a bit with OpenWRT and dual stack IPv6 on my router
utilizing the tunnelbroker service. The more I dig into it, Ive struggled
to figure out what the recommended mechanism is.
Right now, I have it configured with Radvd. But I could have also used
dnsmasq to do ip
Sorry if my previous mail sounded like a command - was not intended.
It's all about opinion. I prefer "Do not add issues/mistakes/typos, if
you know about them."
You decide as its your contribution. And I'm only a contributor myself.
Maddes
On 06.09.2012 22:34, Jonh Wendell wrote:
> hi!
>
> befo
hi!
before making the patch, I've read https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6992
I decided to go CamelCase to keep the current style and let the change
happen when that bug is fixed.
makes sense?
2012/9/6 Matthias Buecher / Germany
> Please use lowercase options like all other packages do.
> Unfortu
Please use lowercase options like all other packages do.
Unfortunately DropBear is one package that has several Camel writings.
I wish that Attitude Adjustment would change this to lower case.
Maddes
On 06.09.2012 21:48, Jonh Wendell wrote:
> Once this patch is accepted, I'll update the wiki page
Once this patch is accepted, I'll update the wiki page
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/dropbear
>From 9509ba3a76b014155671cbea72a07caafaf27970 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonh Wendell
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:45:29 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [package] dropbear: Supports IdleTimeout uci config opti
Scratch that last support request.
I made it work B-)
I will release a how-to.
I feel so good now that I am considering donating hardware :)
Regards.
6 September 2012 20:31, NetworkPro wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: NetworkPro
> Date: 6 September 2012 19:29
> Subjec
Hello,
I am happy to read the Attitude Adjustment announcement on OpenWRT.org
and I agree with the decision you made.
The announced inspired me to trust OpenWRT as my main Home Office
router but MultiWAN is not working so I am going back to a MikroTik
RouterOS solution (extremely stable and aweso
13 matches
Mail list logo
