Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Patch] 64 bit network interface stats in luci

2012-07-11 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The LuCI patch will not properly work that way, OpenWrt Lua does not handle numeric integer values > 2^31 bit. A somewhat larger range can be stored as float but the precision is not enough: # lua -e 'print(string.format("%d", tonumber("18446744073709

[OpenWrt-Devel] [Patch] 64 bit network interface stats in luci

2012-07-11 Thread Kevin Groeneveld
One thing that has annoyed me for a long time on Linux systems is when the network interface stats overflow at 32bit. Later versions of the kernel support 64 bit stats on a 32 bit system to fix this. However the current trunk version of openwrt and luci truncate the stats back to 32 bit. Not all

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BCM4706 and bcma: "Skipping PCI bus scan due to resource conflict"

2012-07-11 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 07/11/2012 03:25 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2012/7/11 Rafał Miłecki : >> My main bcma bus has 2 PCIe slots with 2 802.11 cards. The problem is >> that only one card can be registered at the time. Function responsible >> for registering PCI controller is: >> void __devinit bcma_core_pci_hostmode_

[OpenWrt-Devel] Build problems with Eglibc and curl

2012-07-11 Thread Philip Prindeville
Travis & Felix: I can't get Curl to build with eglibc 2.14 (and if I remember, 2.15): OpenWrt-libtool: compile: i486-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../include/curl -I../include -I../include -I../lib -I../lib -isystem /home/philipp/openwrt-alix/staging_dir/target-i386_eglibc-2.14.1/us

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] add notion of essential processes for sysupgrade

2012-07-11 Thread Ryan Nowakowski
Currently /lib/upgrade/common.sh contains a static list of essential processes that shouldn't be killed during sysupgrade. This changes that static list into a dynamic one built from a ESSENTIAL_PROCESSES shell variable in package init scripts. That way, packages can declare their own essential p

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] add ESSENTIAL_PROCESSES to appropriate init scripts in packages repo

2012-07-11 Thread Ryan Nowakowski
This adds an ESSENTIAL_PROCESSES shell variable to /etc/init.d/sshd. The corresponding openwrt patch has the details. Signed-off-by: Ryan Nowakowski --- net/openssh/files/sshd.init |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/openssh/files/sshd.init b/net/openssh/files/sshd.init in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Bounty: /overlay on x86

2012-07-11 Thread Christoph Thielecke
Hello, > Pardon, I know I am a rookie here. > > I just wanna say that I found > > There is overlayfs implement in Ubuntu 12.04 install Disk. > And of course it's for x86. I guess its aufs. With best regards Christoph -- Linux User Group Wernigerode http://www.lug-wr.de/ signature.asc Descrip

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] BCM4706 and bcma: "Skipping PCI bus scan due to resource conflict"

2012-07-11 Thread Rafał Miłecki
2012/7/11 Rafał Miłecki : > My main bcma bus has 2 PCIe slots with 2 802.11 cards. The problem is > that only one card can be registered at the time. Function responsible > for registering PCI controller is: > void __devinit bcma_core_pci_hostmode_init(struct bcma_drv_pci *pc) > > The problem is th

[OpenWrt-Devel] BCM4706 and bcma: "Skipping PCI bus scan due to resource conflict"

2012-07-11 Thread Rafał Miłecki
My main bcma bus has 2 PCIe slots with 2 802.11 cards. The problem is that only one card can be registered at the time. Function responsible for registering PCI controller is: void __devinit bcma_core_pci_hostmode_init(struct bcma_drv_pci *pc) The problem is that bcma uses the same IO resource for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Bounty: /overlay on x86

2012-07-11 Thread anton
Dear Sirs: Pardon, I know I am a rookie here. I just wanna say that I found There is overlayfs implement in Ubuntu 12.04 install Disk. And of course it's for x86. Best Rgds, anton -- refered: http://askubuntu.com/questions/109413/how-do-i-use-overlayfs 2012/7/11 Tim Fletcher > On 03/07/12

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Bounty: /overlay on x86

2012-07-11 Thread Tim Fletcher
On 03/07/12 19:37, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: Is /overlay supported on x86? Am I missing something here? Yes they are and I have a confirmed working setup on x86 with a squashfs rootfs and an ext4 overlay, however as someone else has pointed out initramfs is different. The way that overlay