On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 19:16 +, Karl P wrote:
> As a user, I _never_ want to have to go and turn on the switch that says,
> "make
> my device work as fast as it can"
>
> Is there any reason that I would _not_ want this?
You may only have a printer, or something like that, attached to the
c
On 04/30/2012 06:48 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:34 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
There could be a generic Kconfig variable which could be selected by CPU
targets or ethernet drivers (with a dependency on
!HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS).
That's cleaner than messing aroun
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:34 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> There could be a generic Kconfig variable which could be selected by CPU
> targets or ethernet drivers (with a dependency on
> !HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS).
> That's cleaner than messing around with #define stuff manually.
Don't just s
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 11:11 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >>> On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:4
On 2012-04-30 8:11 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Ta
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> Tell it to however wired up th
On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
Actually that mes
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
>>> Actually that message was already received, successor chipsets
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:49 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>> Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
>> Actually that message was already received, successor chipsets from
>> this manufacturer did it up right.
>
> So
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>> Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
>> Actually that message was already received, successor chipsets from
>> this manufacturer did it up right.
>
> So the real
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
> Actually that message was already received, successor chipsets from
> this manufacturer did it up right.
So the real problem is that the ar71xx doesn't allow you to DMA to
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:49 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 14:48 -0700, Dave Täht wrote:
>>
Thank you very much for the code review!
+
>> +-#define tcp_flag_word(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))->words [3])
>> ++#define tcp_flag_word2(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))->w
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 14:48 -0700, Dave Täht wrote:
>
> +
> +-#define tcp_flag_word(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))->words [3])
> ++#define tcp_flag_word2(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))->words [3])
> ++#define tcp_flag_word(tp) ( __get_unaligned_cpu32(&(((union tcp_word_hdr
> *)(tp))->wo
Le 28/04/2012 22:50, Mirko Vogt a écrit :
By the way: All your patches didn't apply out of the box due to
whitespace errors.
My bad. I think I did a straight svn diff + select the text in my
xterm and copy it using the middle button. That may have changed
the whitespaces here and there. I'll do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I merged your branches into my openwrt, packages and luci repos and gave it a
try over the past 24 hours running on a ath9k-based router.
Results: very nice. This should go uptream.
On 27/04/12 15:39, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:
15 matches
Mail list logo
