Noticed these while reviewing the code.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hintz
--- /dev/null 2012-03-21 21:16:41.055325718 -0700
+++ target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-3.2/238-bcma-host_pci_devexit.patch
2012-03-29 08:29:07.340988396 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+--- a/drivers/bcma/host_pci.c
b/drivers/bcma
Hi Hauke:
I think this addresses your concerns.
Changes since v2: Modified to not expose bcma_core_mips_irq; modified for
completeness.
The new function (bcma_core_irq) could probably be made a "static inline", and
simply retrieve the assigned
IRQ directly from the core (or just delete it and
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Otto Solares Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:03:24PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> > however my issue is that hostapd isn't coming
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Otto Solares Cabrera wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:03:24PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>> > however my issue is that hostapd isn't coming up for ap mode.
>>
>> Yeah in 3.3 the mon.wlan0 i/f is not being
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Otto Solares Cabrera wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:03:24PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> > however my issue is that hostapd isn't coming up for ap mode.
>
> Yeah in 3.3 the mon.wlan0 i/f is not being setup but I didn't
> investigate further.
>
Your confirmation
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:47:03PM +0300, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-03-29 1:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > On 2012-03-29 11:50 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Le 03/28/12 00:49, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
> >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hell
Hello,
On 03/29/2012 05:34 PM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> * P1020WLAN RevD
> * SMP enabled kernel
>
The 230-p1020wlan-dts patch didn't worked when the target profile
"Freescale P1020WLAN Reference Board" is selected.
> .../linux/mpc85xx/patches/230-p1020wlan-dts.patch | 300
>
Hi,
I applied the new 7 patches from Wojtek (see mail "[PATCH 0/7] mpc85xx:
P1010RDB and P1020WLAN support"), compiled the sources and the p1020wlan
image boots.
With the patches the kernel recognized the 2 cores. But the RAM problem
is not gone.
I also tested the eth1 interface. It works ;) I g
hi devs,
you may have heard of maranello, a project to add
partial packet recovery to 80211, by adding block checksums
on transmit, validating them or re-requesting retransmit
of corrupted blocks.
http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/maranello/
the code at the page is for 2.6.29-rc2
Ive applied the p
* P1020WLAN RevD
* SMP enabled kernel
Signed-off-by: Wojciech Dubowik
---
target/linux/mpc85xx/config-default| 30 ++-
target/linux/mpc85xx/image/Makefile|2 +-
.../linux/mpc85xx/patches/230-p1020wlan-dts.patch | 300
target/linux/mp
---
target/linux/generic/config-3.3 |1 +
target/linux/mpc85xx/config-default |4 ++--
target/linux/mpc85xx/modules.mk | 21 +
target/linux/mpc85xx/profiles/100-mpc854x.mk |2 +-
target/linux/mpc85xx/profiles/200-p1010rdb.mk
---
package/kernel/modules/other.mk| 14 +
.../generic/patches-3.3/841-rtc_pt7c4338.patch | 253
2 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/patches-3.3/841-rtc_pt7c4338.patch
diff --git a/package/kern
---
target/linux/generic/config-3.3|1 +
target/linux/mpc85xx/Makefile |2 +-
target/linux/mpc85xx/config-default| 66 +---
.../mpc85xx/patches/100-fix_mpc8568e_mds.patch | 82 +++-
.../mpc85xx/pat
---
package/kernel/modules/i2c.mk | 18 +-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/modules/i2c.mk b/package/kernel/modules/i2c.mk
index 0d525cc..d2b45d6 100644
--- a/package/kernel/modules/i2c.mk
+++ b/package/kernel/modules/i2c.mk
@@ -143,7
These patches upgrade kernel to 3.3 and add board support
for P1010RDB and P1020WLAN reference designs from Freescale.
Known issues:
* long autonegotiation times for phys on P1020WLAN
* flash layouts on P1020WLAN are finished
* ethernet mappings for P1020WLAN needs to be cleaned up but
it wil
---
target/linux/mpc85xx/profiles/200-p1010rdb.mk |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/mpc85xx/profiles/200-p1010rdb.mk
b/target/linux/mpc85xx/profiles/200-p1010rdb.mk
index 9d67080..b7593a3 100644
--- a/target/linux/mpc85xx/profiles/200-p1010rdb.
---
target/linux/mpc85xx/image/Makefile|6 +-
.../mpc85xx/patches/200-p1010-dts-typo-fix.patch | 11 +++
.../mpc85xx/patches/210-p1010-flash-layout.patch | 85
target/linux/mpc85xx/profiles/100-mpc854x.mk | 17
target/linux/mpc85xx/prof
> Hello,
>
> On 03/28/2012 09:08 AM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> > Unless somebody else wants to do it I will try to consolidate
> > the patches for mpc85xx and post for review.
>
> Do you have any progress?
I am working at the moment on P1020WLAN dts file. I have now
eth0 and eth1 working but
On 2012-03-29 1:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-03-29 11:50 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Le 03/28/12 00:49, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
Le 03/27/12 15:43, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
> Hi!
Hello,
On 03/28/2012 09:08 AM, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> Unless somebody else wants to do it I will try to consolidate
> the patches for mpc85xx and post for review.
Do you have any progress?
> Hopefully P1020WLAN dts file won't take too long so I can do it this
> week.
Do you need the offi
Hi,
Looks like the localmirrors part of the patch was merged already a few
years ago. please use $scripts/localmirrors instead of the .default variant
the second part of the patch is in theory ok, we can find the file also
in subfolders. however the way it is implemented will lead to X files
bein
Hi Simon,
> I hardcoded only the first part of the data - the fixup data - which
> should not change between different insttances of the same model, and
> then read the nand partition at the time the ath driver loaded.
>
> you should be able to do something similar to read your file?
My eeprom fi
On 03/22/2012 09:05 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Wagner
>
Hi Peter Wagner,
my current plan is to leave kernel version 3.3 out and directly go to
3.4 if someone adds the rc to OpenWrt trunk. If I would add 3.3 support
I had to apply my changes for both kernel versions 3.2 and 3.
On 2012-03-29 11:50 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 03/28/12 00:49, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Le 03/27/12 15:43, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
Hi!
I have a WRT160NL with the 3 interfaces (e
thanks, applied in [31135]
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
thanks, applied in [31136]
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Le 03/28/12 00:49, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
Le 03/27/12 15:43, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
Hi!
I have a WRT160NL with the 3 interfaces (eth0, eth1, wlan0) on a single
bridge (br-lan) and I was normally doing fil
Hello Florian,
I will have another look on it after easter, when I'm back in the office.
Am 27.03.2012 21:21, schrieb Florian Fainelli:
Hello Thomas,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 19:19:00 thomas.lan...@lantiq.com wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes the iptables build if no extensions are selected (e.g
Hi,
Please let me know your feedback on the submitted patch.
Regards,
Tatha
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sent: 22 March 2012 17:53
To: 'OpenWrt Development List'
Subject: [PATCH] Patch to use local repository and follow symbolic links
Hi,
Atta
Hi Pieter,
on my BT HHV2B, my calibration data is in nand. I need it at two
points, the first to read the PCI fixup data (used before nand has
been probed) and then for the actual ath driver (after nand has been
probed).
I hardcoded only the first part of the data - the fixup data - which
should
30 matches
Mail list logo
