Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] listener: new package

2011-10-14 Thread Xiangfu Liu
Hi Raphael I commit this package to our repo first. checkout: http://projects.qi-hardware.com/index.php/p/openwrt-packages/source/commit/f3d79bd/ and make is work out of box on Ben Nanonote. @Folkert Please consider merge those two patches to upstream: http://projects.qi-hardware.com/index

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] releasing the PBX interface: luci-app-pbx

2011-10-14 Thread i iordanov
Hi Jow, On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > I gave it a try and it looks quite good on first sight. > However I have some issues, the sections in the call routing tab are > empty This is actually "intended" behavior, although it may seem strange. 1) When a provider's field

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] releasing the PBX interface: luci-app-pbx

2011-10-14 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Iordan, I gave it a try and it looks quite good on first sight. However I have some issues, the sections in the call routing tab are empty and the "Server Setting for Local SIP Devices" shows no input field. You might want to recheck this on a fre

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] mini_snmpd uci network interfaces support

2011-10-14 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
I have done a patch that make mini_snmpd more uci style +Instead of one option with comma separated interfaces now use uci list +Intestad of use only real interface name now can use also uci interface name the init script check if the interface name specified is from uci than traslate it to real

[OpenWrt-Devel] mini_snmpd uci network interfaces support

2011-10-14 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Hey all! I see that in mini_snmpd config you have to use a list of real name interfaces comma separated, that not the uci style... I am thinking to write a patch to use uci list instead of option and more over you can use uci network name also instead of real name interface only What do you th