sorry there was a typo in the email:
target system -> Atheros ar71xx
target profile -> Default ( all drivers )
you should use the image for bullet not the one for nanostation
2011/9/5 Damien Courtaillier :
>
> Gioacchino Mazzurco gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> p.s. the working image is the one f
Hi all,
I've been working on the requirements specification for
boot/preinit/init to try to illuminate what preinit/init has to be able
to do to be feature complete compared to the current version, plus the
new features we want to have. I was originally looking for a way to
reduce what preinit do
Second patch in getting Wt working on openwrt.
---
libs/wt/Makefile | 164 ++
1 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 libs/wt/Makefile
diff --git a/libs/wt/Makefile b/libs/wt/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0
Hi,
The intent of these 2 patches is to get Wt running on openwrt. (It's a c++ web
framework).
It worked out really well for the application I wrote, although it requires
a bit of space when built as shared libraries. (Of course, static builds and
aggressive linking can reduce the size for a sp
06.09.2011 01:31, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> Now I want WAN and LAN1-4 leds to be lit when active link detected on
> appropriate port and to blink on tx/rx. It's easy to achive for wan port with
> help of ledtrig-netdev as this port is connected to a dedicated CPU ethernet
> interface (eth1 in my ca
Upgrade uboot-envtools to the newest version, add example config file
and refresh patches.
Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov < openwrt ->-to->- lukaperkov.net >
---
Index: package/uboot-envtools/patches/001-crc32_func_signature.patch
===
--
Good day to all,
For last two days I've been trying to build the replacement for my old-good
DIR-320 home router running OpenWRT. Due to a number of reasons I don't want to
dive into I ended up with buying DIR-615 rev. E4 router and trying to get
working under OpenWRT.
Current OpenWRT trunk don't
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:11:43 +0200
Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > I am still wondering how enabling preempt could possibly workaround/hide
> > an alignment bug. sounds strange to me. Does somebody have an idea?
> >
> > I didn't look too closely at the function yet, though.
> Look at "BadVA : 6fbb600f" -
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:58:58AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2011 22:44:08 Luka Perkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:47:46PM +0200, Michael Büsch wrote:
> > If you want to debug say so and I'll send you vmlinux file. I'm not going
> > to debug this further.
>
On 2011-09-05 3:25 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200
Luka Perkov wrote:
Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]:
Cpu 0
$ 0 : 0006 0011
$ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010
$ 8 : c578 6e617332 6e617332
$12 : 000
Gioacchino Mazzurco gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> p.s. the working image is the one for bullet ;)
> 2010/12/24 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmail.com>
> It seems is a problem of target!Using "Ubiquity product" as target images miss
everything about wireless also iwUsing "Default ( alla driver )" as target
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:25 +, Michael Büsch wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200
> Luka Perkov wrote:
> > Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]:
> > Cpu 0
> > $ 0 : 0006 0011
> > $ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010
> > $ 8 : c578 6e617
It would appear to be an Atheros device
-http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/buffalo/wzr-hp-g300h
I would suggest starting here -
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/recipes/atheroswds
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 21:57 +0900, 马进 wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am using wzr-hp-g300nh right now. The firmware is openwrt. How to
>
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:25 +, Michael Büsch wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200
> Luka Perkov wrote:
> > Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]:
> > Cpu 0
> > $ 0 : 0006 0011
> > $ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010
> > $ 8 : c578 6e617
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200
Luka Perkov wrote:
> Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]:
> Cpu 0
> $ 0 : 0006 0011
> $ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010
> $ 8 : c578 6e617332 6e617332
> $12 :
> $16 : 6f
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:58:58 +0200
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now this looks better, I am not opposed at all in us exposing such a kernel
> configuration option to users through OpenWrt's menuconfig.
I'm completely fine with this as long as it defaults to no-preempt
and that it is not advertises a
Hi all,
I am using wzr-hp-g300nh right now. The firmware is openwrt. How to setup the inter AP communication? I want to let one AP know the existence of another AP which is in the range of network contention. Do you have any ideas about it?
Thank you.
Regards
_
Hi all,
I am using wzr-hp-g300nh right now. The firmware is openwrt. How to setup
the inter AP communication? I want to let one AP know the existence of
another AP which is in the range of network contention. Do you have any
ideas about it?
Thank you.
Regards.
On Sunday 04 September 2011 22:44:08 Luka Perkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:47:46PM +0200, Michael Büsch wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 01:06:02 +0200
> >
> > Luka Perkov wrote:
> > > > What are you actually trying to fix with enabling preemption? I
> > > > didn't really get it by reading
19 matches
Mail list logo
