Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-11 Thread John Zavgren
Thanks, Christian: I read the article on the wiki and then I tried "make package/vislinkRcv/compile" from the TOPDIR (vislinkRcv is the stuff that I'm developing) and no KLM was actually built. When I do the general purpose "make" operation from the same context, it is built. Confused. On Wed, M

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-11 Thread Christian Sobkowski
>> A 'make path/to/package/compile' (i.e. 'make package/busybox/compile') >> in the TOPDIR with an optional V=99 switch will do the trick. > > Note that the "patch/to/package" bit is misleading. > > Even if a package is in package/feeds/packages/foobar/ you can still > just say make package/foob

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-11 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > A 'make path/to/package/compile' (i.e. 'make package/busybox/compile') > in the TOPDIR with an optional V=99 switch will do the trick. Note that the "patch/to/package" bit is misleading. Even if a package is in package/feeds/packages/foobar/ you ca

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-11 Thread Christian Sobkowski
The Wiki basically answers it: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/build A 'make path/to/package/compile' (i.e. 'make package/busybox/compile') in the TOPDIR with an optional V=99 switch will do the trick. Cheers, Christian On May 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, John Zavgren wrote: > If I wish to build j

[OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-11 Thread John Zavgren
If I wish to build just one KLM (or application, or library), is there a way I can target my build to just that one thing? At this time, I'm executing a make command at the top level of the openWRT source tree, every time I wish to cross compile something. And, ... , that's awfully slow. Thanks, J

[OpenWrt-Devel] kgdb?

2011-05-11 Thread John Zavgren
Dear readers: I need to debug a kernel loadable module via gdb when the kernel is running on a device that doesn't have a traditional DB9/RS232 serial interface. Although, it does have a USB interface that I might be able to use in some way (help!) to create a serial interface that I could connect

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Of stripping executable/relocatable

2011-05-11 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2011-05-11 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: On 05/10/2011 07:03 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2011-05-10 3:37 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: Hello, I'm facing an interesting porting challenge : one of the program which is to be installed on our target is compressed using upx. As you may kn

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH V2 2/2] bcm63xx: Add support for the T-Home Speedport W 303V

2011-05-11 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:05:31 Jonas Gorski wrote: > Add the required board definition, default config and image generation for > the T-Home Speedport W 303V Typ B. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski > --- Applied in r26878, thanks! -- Florian ___ openw

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] bcm63xx: Add firmware helpers for T-Home Speedport W 303V

2011-05-11 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:05:30 Jonas Gorski wrote: > Add two helpers for generating correctly tagged images for the T-Home > Speedport W 303V Typ B as well as xor'd ones as required by CFE. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski > --- Applied in r26877, thanks! -- Florian

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] bcm63xx: Accept any led with power in its name as power led

2011-05-11 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Thursday 21 April 2011 05:37:17 Jonas Gorski wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski > --- Applied in r26875, thanks! -- Florian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] bcm63xx: Update support for the DSL-274xB revision C

2011-05-11 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Thursday 21 April 2011 05:37:18 Jonas Gorski wrote: > Rename the DSL-274xB rev C2's board ID to "AW4139" to match the one used > for the rev C3 (same hardware) and add a fixup for C2. Also generate > images for C3. > > While we are at it, rename the LEDs to conform to the Linux LED naming > con

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] bcm63xx: Decouple Board ID and image name for fixup

2011-05-11 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Thursday 21 April 2011 05:37:16 Jonas Gorski wrote: > Make the fixup board ID independent from the image name to allow using > the same board ID for similar devices. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski > --- Applied in r26874, thanks! -- Florian ___ ope

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/4] package/kernel: netfilter: Remove 2.4/2.6 references

2011-05-11 Thread Jonas Gorski
There's only 2.6, so it doesn't make sense to mention modules that are 2.4 only or for modules that they are available only for 2.6. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski --- package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk | 20 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/pa

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 4/4] package/kernel: crypto: Remove renamed modules hack

2011-05-11 Thread Jonas Gorski
Since the oldest kernel in trunk is 2.6.30 the modules always use the newer names, so we can just use the _generic prefix directly. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski --- package/kernel/modules/crypto.mk | 32 +--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] package/kernel: Remove all 2.4 definitions

2011-05-11 Thread Jonas Gorski
With no 2.4 support in trunk, we can safely remove any 2.4 definitions for kmods and merge the 2.6 definitions into the generic ones. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski --- Changes RFT -> V1: * Removed one superflous added line package/kernel/modules/block.mk | 47 -

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] package/kernel: Remove old kernel cruft

2011-05-11 Thread Jonas Gorski
Over the time the kernel module definitions have collected a lot of workarounds for the differences between 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, and for differences between older and newer 2.6 kernels. Since the oldest supported kernel in trunk is now 2.6.30, we can safely drop most of these workarounds. We can

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/4] package/kernel: Remove $(KMOD_SUFFIX) usage

2011-05-11 Thread Jonas Gorski
Since there's only 2.6 in trunk $(KMOD_SUFFIX) can be safely replaced with ko for all mainline kernel modules. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski --- package/kernel/modules/block.mk | 30 +++--- package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk |2 +- package/kernel/modules/netsup

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] mac80211 packet injection with rate setting

2011-05-11 Thread Paweł Foremski
The patch I sent works for me with Mikrotik's RB52n cards (ie. 802.11n). I don't plan to test anything else, as this is what satisfies me. You may find my userspace code on my website [1], in generator.git/interface.c. [1] http://www.iitis.pl/~pjf/ 2011/5/10 Roberto Riggio : > Did you have any l

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Of stripping executable/relocatable

2011-05-11 Thread Emmanuel Deloget
On 05/10/2011 07:03 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2011-05-10 3:37 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: Hello, I'm facing an interesting porting challenge : one of the program which is to be installed on our target is compressed using upx. As you may know, upx-compressed programs are not to be stripped (st