Hello Jo-Philipp,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 05:09:38PM +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Committed in r26784 - thanks.
> Would you be willing to maintain this package in the future?
Thanks very much! Yes, I would like to maintain this package! Should I
just send patches to the mailing list or do you
Committed in r26792, thanks.
Would you be willing to maintain that package in the future?
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
This patch was committed in r26727.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
committed in r26790 with two slight changes:
- Fixed the copyright string to display 2011
- Added PKG_FIXUP:=autoreconf to make sure the OpenWrt
libtool is used.
Would you be willing to maintain this package in the future?
~ Jow
___
openwrt-
Committed in r26789 - thanks!
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
This one was committed in r26694, thanks.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Committed in r26788 - thanks!
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Committed in r26787 - thanks!
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Patch didn't apply but I added the entry anyway in r26785 - thanks.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Committed in r26784 - thanks.
Would you be willing to maintain this package in the future?
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Committed in r26783, thanks!
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r26782, thanks.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
why not just change "ld-*.so" to "ld-*.so*" ?
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Sorry it still does not apply:
patching file package/libpcap/patches/101-makefile_create_bindir.patch
patching file package/libpcap/patches/103-makefile_flex_workaround.patch
Hunk #1 FAILED at 3.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
package/libpcap/patches/103-makefile_flex_workaround.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:02 PM, devendra.aaru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a patch for 2.6.35.7 kernel (vanilla one) to support SR9600
> usbtonet cards.
> anyone interested?
>
> dev.
>
Hello,
sorry the patch works for other kernels too. with little modifications in
the structure of usb_device_id
On 04/28/11 18:29, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> In my opinion, that should be okay, but I'm also using IPv6
> regularly. What would be the alternative, installing the bridge as
> a kernel module instead of kernel built-in as it is currently done?
>
> Hmm, if no one is screaming about any space issues an
16 matches
Mail list logo
