On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Travis Kemen wrote:
> As far as OpenWRT goes it works great on the device. I am convinced that I
> am not getting the full power out of device though with madwifi, I am able
> to get a better signal on the AP with the sock firmware than I am with
> madwifi (my situ
As far as OpenWRT goes it works great on the device. I am convinced that I
am not getting the full power out of device though with madwifi, I am able
to get a better signal on the AP with the sock firmware than I am with
madwifi (my situations have allowed me to still use it with the decreased
powe
On 2011-04-17 11:39 PM, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Hi,
Le dimanche 17 avril 2011 à 20:33 +0200, Felix Fietkau a écrit :
On 2011-04-17 7:49 PM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich
Applied in r26704
I heard that 2.6.35 has been chosen as a “flag” version for embedded
use: ht
Hi,
Le dimanche 17 avril 2011 à 20:33 +0200, Felix Fietkau a écrit :
> On 2011-04-17 7:49 PM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich
> Applied in r26704
I heard that 2.6.35 has been chosen as a “flag” version for embedded
use: http://lwn.net/Articles/413341/
Does OpenWRT deve
On 2011-04-17 7:50 PM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Use offset from struct mtd_part instead of struct mtd_partition for defining
the new partitions. This enables the usage of MTDPART_OFS_APPEND macro in
struct mtd_partition.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich
Applied in r26705
_
On 2011-04-17 7:49 PM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich
Applied in r26704
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Use offset from struct mtd_part instead of struct mtd_partition for defining
the new partitions. This enables the usage of MTDPART_OFS_APPEND macro in
struct mtd_partition.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich
---
.../generic/patches-2.6.30/065-rootfs_split.patch | 12 +++-
.../generic/pat
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich
---
Xorg/lib/pango/Makefile |8
Xorg/lib/pango/patches/001-automake-compat.patch | 12
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 Xorg/lib/pango/patches/001-automake-compat.patch
diff
Sorry for the spam, but a few more direct links with some relevant
information on the project, just so people have a clue of what they might be
working on :)
http://www.caida.org/workshops/isma/1102/slides/aims1102_ssundaresan.pdf
http://gettys.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/caida-workshop/
Thanks,
Tim
Greetings All!
I am on a team of folks working on the BISMark project over at Georgia Tech
and around the world.
The BISMark project is part of an effort to benchmark the openness of
network connections [1] as well as a means to collect data for identifying
problems such as bufferbloat [2] in ups
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Travis Kemen wrote:
> I have flashed the PowerStation 2 with the LS2 images.
Were you pleased with the results?
Were there any unexpected results?
How about the dual polarity model (17D)? If you did any of the 17D
models, did you run in Adaptive polarity or did
I have flashed the PowerStation 2 with the LS2 images. As as far as
deploying OpenWrt the first time to devices in the field you would need the
images setup per device, upgrades in the future could be done with a stock
image as sysupgrade will keep the configuration of the device (not all the
custo
12 matches
Mail list logo
