[OpenWrt-Devel] directory error [OpenWrt-Commits] r26682 - in trunk: . trunk trunk/target trunk/target/linux trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.35 trunk/target/linux/b

2011-04-16 Thread Hongpeng Tian
directory error Author: cshore > Date: 2011-04-15 16:31:39 +0200 (Fri, 15 Apr 2011) > New Revision: 26682 > > Added: >trunk/trunk/ >trunk/trunk/target/ >trunk/trunk/target/linux/ >trunk/trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/ >trunk/trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-2.6.35/ > > tru

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is it possible to get support for the Ubiquiti Power Station 2 or is it already supported?

2011-04-16 Thread Outback Dingo
The Ubiquiti PowerStation 2 is the same as the Ubiquiti LS2 image, its basically a LS2 in a case with antennas On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > List changed from openwrt-users to openwrt-devel to get an > authoritative answer and, in addition, the TP-Link TL-WA5210G is added

[OpenWrt-Devel] is it possible to get support for the Ubiquiti Power Station 2 or is it already supported?

2011-04-16 Thread Larry Vaden
List changed from openwrt-users to openwrt-devel to get an authoritative answer and, in addition, the TP-Link TL-WA5210G is added to the query. In addition, if we are to change to OpenWrt across the board, including CPEs, we need to know about the legacy Ubiquiti products which seem to be excluded

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Request for Testing: samba 3.0.37 v2

2011-04-16 Thread Maarten Bezemer
It is been almost a week without responses, does that mean that the patch is good enough now and ready to be applied? Or am I being too impatient? ;) Maarten On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 23:50 +0200, Maarten Bezemer wrote: > Here is my second try of the patch updating samba3 to version 3.0.37 > (highest

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to recognize if a default route is active

2011-04-16 Thread Stefan Tomanek
Dies schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich (x...@subsignal.org): > I'd suggest to use "ip route list exact 0.0.0.0/0" to find the device > and then the find_config() shell function to map the device to an uci > interface name. Just a remark: It is possible that this command does not return a default route even