Juhos, is there any chance we could backport the 841nd v7 support for
10.03.1 rc5? Trunk seems to run great on it.
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
> - Removed the avm patch, as lots of things got included in the newer
>version and the left-over parts seemed to break samba
The left over parts where stripping down of samba.
How big is the final 3.0.37 smbd without this AVM patch?
~ Jow
Allow a redirect like:
config redirect
option src 'wan'
option dest 'lan'
option src_dport '22001'
option dest_port '22'
option proto 'tcp'
note the absence of the "dest_ip" field, meaning to terminate the connection on
the firewall itself.
This patch mak
On 04/07/2011 09:29 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Add a bundle for including commonly useful modules for IPtables debugging and
> development.
>
> For now, it just contains xt_TRACE.ko
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
Thank you for the patch.
It was applied in r26567.
Hauke
__
Hello
This patch has been applied in r26482 on the trunk (thanks acinonyx)
Can someone backport it in the backfire branch
Thanks in advance
Le 03/04/2011 22:12, Etienne Champetier a écrit :
> Hello
>
> This patch add accounting configuration in hostapd.sh
> It also change "server, port, key" to
On 4/9/11 6:07 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 04/09/2011 02:38 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> If your ISP is pushing their own DSL equipment (which many do to contain
>> support costs), they won't be
>> forthcoming with your various settings: encapsulation, VPI/VCI, etc.
>>
>> These you might ha
On 4/9/11 6:06 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 04/09/2011 04:20 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> If your ISP is pushing their own DSL equipment (which many do to contain
>> support costs), they won't be
>> forthcoming with your various settings: encapsulation, VPI/VCI, etc.
>>
>> These you might ha
max.mus...@kaffeeschluerfer.com pretended :
Thanks for you quick answer:
[...]
But of course I am aware that supporting more actual platforms has more
importance and maybe I am the only one with this rather old platform, but
afaik there used to be some of them on the market, used e.g. by germ
On 04/09/2011 02:38 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> If your ISP is pushing their own DSL equipment (which many do to contain
> support costs), they won't be
> forthcoming with your various settings: encapsulation, VPI/VCI, etc.
>
> These you might have to discover yourself. The easiest way to do
On 04/09/2011 04:20 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> If your ISP is pushing their own DSL equipment (which many do to contain
> support costs), they won't be
> forthcoming with your various settings: encapsulation, VPI/VCI, etc.
>
> These you might have to discover yourself. The easiest way to do
On 09/04/11 11:31, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:11 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>> On 07/04/11 12:06, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, ngp ngp wrote:
This patch adds initial support for arv4510 boards (bewan ibox, wippies
homebox, elisa)
>>>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:11 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 07/04/11 12:06, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:57 PM, ngp ngp wrote:
>>> This patch adds initial support for arv4510 boards (bewan ibox, wippies
>>> homebox, elisa)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just got a Tele2Box (an ISP i
On 8 April 2011 21:52, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Since the PHY driver is only used for the WAN port and there is virtually
> no difference between it and the generic PHY driver, we can sefely remove
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski
> ---
>
> This has been tested on a WNDR3700 v1 and it didn't sh
13 matches
Mail list logo