[OpenWrt-Devel] openssl 1.0.0d update patch

2011-02-08 Thread Peter Wagner
diff --git a/package/openssl/Makefile b/package/openssl/Makefile index 80af0ce..26c56a2 100644 --- a/package/openssl/Makefile +++ b/package/openssl/Makefile @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk PKG_NAME:=openssl -PKG_VERSION:=1.0.0c +PKG_VERSION:=1.0.0d PKG_RELEASE:=1 PKG_SOURCE:=$(P

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Commits] r25417 - trunk/package/busybox/files

2011-02-08 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 2/8/11 3:29 AM, Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote: On Tuesday 08 February 2011 03:51:21 Mark Mentovai wrote: I wonder why this didn’t just use ~root. There’s no way to disable tilde expansion in Busybox ash, so ~root should always be available. It would certainly be more elegant and reliable than th

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Commits] r25414 - trunk/package/hotplug2/patches

2011-02-08 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 2/8/11 3:15 AM, Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote: On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:57:23 Philip Prindeville wrote: Why would include files ever be missing in the first place? What's the root-cause problem this is attempting to fix? This patch is not a bugfix; it's an enhancement. See also r25415.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Commits] r25417 - trunk/package/busybox/files

2011-02-08 Thread Mark Mentovai
Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote: > It's not so safe, as user home dir can be overriden in a shell by setting > the "$HOME" environment variable. This is at least an explicit declaration that something else ought to be treated as ${HOME}; if someone sets it badly, all sorts of things are subject to fail

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Supporting a new brcm63xx board

2011-02-08 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello, On Tuesday 08 February 2011 15:02:27 Marco Antonio Mauro wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to write a patch to add support for a new brcm63xx board. I > already posted in the forum (link: > https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=25578 ); there jow said I > should get in touch with florian

[OpenWrt-Devel] Supporting a new brcm63xx board

2011-02-08 Thread Marco Antonio Mauro
Hello, I'm trying to write a patch to add support for a new brcm63xx board. I already posted in the forum (link: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=25578 ); there jow said I should get in touch with florian through this mailing list. How can I add support for that board? Which files need

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] bcm63xx: Fix build of brcm-wl.

2011-02-08 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello, On Thursday 03 February 2011 23:22:55 Jonas Gorski wrote: > The fallback needs to be exported for bcm63xx, too. Runtime tested with a > BCM4322 on a BCM6358. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski > --- Applied in r25420, thanks! -- Florian ___ openwr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath: fix world regulatory domain fix-up so that all regulatory rules are processed

2011-02-08 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2011-02-08 5:25 AM, Mark Mentovai wrote: > ath: fix world regulatory domain fix-up so that all regulatory rules are > processed > > r24503 (trunk) and r24505 (backfire) revised the regulatory rules used > for the ath drivers' world regulatory domains in the 5GHz band by > opening up channels 36

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Commits] r25417 - trunk/package/busybox/files

2011-02-08 Thread Vasilis Tsiligiannis
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 03:51:21 Mark Mentovai wrote: > I wonder why this didn’t just use ~root. There’s no way to disable > tilde expansion in Busybox ash, so ~root should always be available. > It would certainly be more elegant and reliable than this shell > function, unless there’s a fear t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Commits] r25417 - trunk/package/busybox/files

2011-02-08 Thread Vasilis Tsiligiannis
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 03:19:22 Philip Prindeville wrote: > Has this been tested where root isn't the first entry in /etc/passwd? > > Because there's no requirement for the entries to be sorted on uid... It should work regardless where "root" is placed in the file. -- Vasilis Tsiligiannis

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Commits] r25414 - trunk/package/hotplug2/patches

2011-02-08 Thread Vasilis Tsiligiannis
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:57:23 Philip Prindeville wrote: > Why would include files ever be missing in the first place? > > What's the root-cause problem this is attempting to fix? This patch is not a bugfix; it's an enhancement. See also r25415. -- Vasilis Tsiligiannis signature.asc Desc