Hullo,
I got tired of struggling with less equivalent from busybox so here's
a package with the full newest version.
kkk
From 61bfa731ab3257062f261e2b25a7c25bfcee7547 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: koniu
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:13:31 +
Subject: [PATCH] new package less - full version
Sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I have some question about those three ImageBuilder:
if all my understanding blow is right:
1. ImageBuilder
*it have all packages that selected by .config.
for example if there are 100 packages. we can build a rootfs
only include 20 of
Why would you want to do this?
There's a certain amount of desirability to get a lot of functionality into a "one box
solution", sure, but at some point one has to ask, "how much is too much"?
Having services that are logically co-located (like firewalling and VPN)
together makes sense, but th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
The patch is fine so far but can you rename the package providing the
htdocs to "mjpeg-stream-web" ? This would be in line with other packages
like transmission which are split into transmission-daemon,
transmission-client, transmission-web etc.
20.12.2010 21:45, J. Ryan Earl wrote:
>
> As a note: without the optional www files "http:///?action=stream"
> will give you the stream even though "http:///" will display a
> "not-found" error.
>
This is a behavior which is documented in the depth of mjpg-streamer docs. And
this was exactly the
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:06:35 -0800,
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Is there any strategy to Linux version bumps? It seems that the AR71xx stuff
> went to 2.6.35 about 3 months ago, whereas the x86 stuff is still building
> 2.6.32. It would be nice if everything got caught up to the same ver
Is there any strategy to Linux version bumps? It seems that the AR71xx stuff
went to 2.6.35 about 3 months ago, whereas the x86 stuff is still building
2.6.32. It would be nice if everything got caught up to the same version
within a reasonable window of time, would it not?
-Philip
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've released a new version of Tor. This includes some important
> security fixes to address CVE-2010-1676. It also includes some important
> proactive security changes. New builds of Tor should probably happen for
> this version
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've released a new version of Tor. This includes some important
> security fixes to address CVE-2010-1676. It also includes some important
> proactive security changes. New builds of Tor should probably happen for
> this version
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ar71xx/ar71xx.h
===
--- target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ar71xx/ar71xx.h
(revision
24746)
+++ target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ar71xx/a
http://www.contesti.eu
And a BIG�thank to all that have contributed and contribute to support
Creative Commons and Open Source Work!
Enrico Miglino
--
Ovi Mail: Making email access easy
http://mail.ovi.com
_
On 21 Dec 2010, at 09:37 , Alessio Sangalli wrote:
> But I haven't seen the libuci package in any "general, desktop" distro. This
> complicates things if I wantwd to use lib UCI for my programs.
Hi Alessio,
I maintain a Ubuntu packaging for UCI at:
https://launchpad.net/~afrimesh/+archive/pp
12 matches
Mail list logo
