Committed revision 23627 - Reverts Commit 23626 - Needs fixing
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
> Committed revision 23626.
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jonas Gorski <
> jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> Update ZNC to the newest version. Building modules
Committed revision 23627 - Reverts Commit 23626 - Needs fixing
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> Committed revision 23626.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jonas Gorski <
> jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> Add a startup and a uci configuration for ZNC. This
Committed revision 23627 - Reverts Commit 23626 - Needs fixing
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> Committed revision 23626.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jonas Gorski <
> jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> Create packages for all modules except webadmin, si
Dear OpenWrt Lead Developers,
The 10.03.1 development seems to be stuck on 10.03.1 rc3 for a while
now. No, I am not going to ask for a release date and I also
understand that all openwrt development is based on individuals giving
up their own private time. However, I fear that a succession of rc1
Committed revision 23626.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jonas Gorski <
jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Create packages for all modules except webadmin, since it doesn't compile.
> The extra modules are ignored for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski
>
> >
> ---
> net/znc/Makefil
Committed revision 23626.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jonas Gorski <
jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Add a startup and a uci configuration for ZNC. This allows configuring
> multiple users, loading modules with parameters (global and per user)
> and starts the ZNC binary as nobody
Committed revision 23626.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jonas Gorski <
jonas.gorski+open...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Update ZNC to the newest version. Building modules cannot be disabled
> anymore, so just remove the only one that doesn't build (webadmin).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski
>
> >
>
Add a startup and a uci configuration for ZNC. This allows configuring
multiple users, loading modules with parameters (global and per user)
and starts the ZNC binary as nobody. The latter requires su, so add this
as a dependecy.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski
---
net/znc/Makefile | 10
Create packages for all modules except webadmin, since it doesn't compile.
The extra modules are ignored for now.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski
---
net/znc/Makefile | 526 +-
1 files changed, 524 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/z
Update ZNC to the newest version. Building modules cannot be disabled
anymore, so just remove the only one that doesn't build (webadmin).
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski
---
net/znc/Makefile |9 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/znc/Makefile b/net/znc/M
Default for Geos was coming up as 38400.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Williams
diff --git a/target/linux/x86/image/Config.in b/target/linux/x86/image/Config.in
index 8467f48..0a0e230 100644
--- a/target/linux/x86/image/Config.in
+++ b/target/linux/x86/image/Config.in
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ config X86_GRUB_B
Thats odd.
The up state should be set by /etc/hotplug.d/iface/00-netstate
regardless of the underlying protocol.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
so... what others think? it doesn't worth doing like this?
Regards,
Roman
On 29 September 2010 15:45, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> I've tested this with ramips board.
> Of cause device should be registered but it's intended to be selected
> automatically via target board profiling. For now it should
This patch adds up state for ppp interfaces. Uci_firewall expects up state to
join interface into zone. But ip-up did not specify this
and 3g (ppp) interfaces did not joined firewall zones even if they are up.
Signed-off-by: Lukas macura
---
Index: package/ppp/files/etc/ppp/ip-up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good day.
Today I've been trying to build OpenWRT x86 VDI target to do some experiments
with it and ended up with unbootable image. Build process completed fine,
VirtualBOX recognizes the VDI image, GRUB gets started as it should, loads up
the kernel
Thanks for the feedback Joe.
--
Mike
On 23 Oct 2010, at 17:06, Joseph Roback wrote:
> Thanks Mike. Both of your patches worked well for me. Run .27 since you
> mailing, running .28 right now.
>
> Joe
>
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:31 AM, Mike Brady wrote:
>
>> This updates the avahi package from
16 matches
Mail list logo
