Hello
This is the final patch with the uci-default script from Otto Solares.
Would be nice, if somebody could commit this.
Bernhard
wrt160nl-fixtrx.diff
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
h
Add a KVM guest subtarget to the x86 target. Since VirtIO is the
preferred I/O virtualization platform for kvm, this target expects it's
root device to be /dev/vda.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel
---
target/linux/x86/Makefile |2 +-
target/linux/x86/image/Config.in
Move Xen kernel modules into a general virtualization category.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel
---
package/kernel/modules/{xen.mk => virtual.mk} | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
rename package/kernel/modules/{xen.mk => virtual.mk} (94%)
diff --git a/package/ke
Make the VirtIO modules depend on the new x86_kvm_guest subtarget.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel
---
package/kernel/modules/virtual.mk |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/modules/virtual.mk
b/package/kernel/modules/virtual.mk
index 4aa1d8c.
Add support for VirtIO-based paravirtualized devices used by various
virtualization platforms.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel
---
package/kernel/modules/virtual.mk | 48 +
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/modules/vi
This patch series adds a new x86 subtarget for running inside a KVM guest.
The v2 series fixes some copy-paste errors and an accidentally commited file.
The v3 series fixes missing config symbols.
Stijn Tintel (4):
kernel: move xen.mk to virtual.mk
kernel: add VirtIO device support
x86: add
Hi Developers,
I have ported Markus Gutschke's shellinabox package
(http://code.google.com/p/shellinabox/) to OpenWrt.
This is quite a useful utility where one can have telnet (vt100) type access
through a regular browser, I think it can be of benefit to others or the
platform in general.
Plea
/> Hi, list,
/>/> Are there anybody who are working on the ath9k to support ad hoc mode with
/>/> 802.11n HT?
/>>/ If do, what is the shedule about this work?
/>>/
/
From reading this, it implies that HT does not work in adhoc?
This would explain the 12Mbit/sec rates I'm getting with a nanos
