Description:
1. Description
Since kernel 2.6.32.7 has already included the follwing patch files of kirkwood:
/trunk/target/linux/kirkwood/patches/003-gating.patch
/trunk/target/linux/kirkwood/patches/004-cpuidle.patch
We can just simply remove these 2 patches and replace new
"config-default" and
Description:
1. Suggestion:
1.a This patch add support of m25p80 with mx25lxxx support to kirkwood
based platform.
1.b Because mx25lxxx series are used by many kind of platform with many CPU.
I also suggest someone to merge the patch related to m25p80 in
/target/linux/ar71xx with this patch (
Description:
1. Suggestion:
1.a This patch add support of m25p80 with mx25lxxx support to kirkwood
based platform.
1.b Because mx25lxxx series are used by many kind of platform with many CPU.
I also suggest someone to merge the patch related to m25p80 in
/target/linux/ar71xx with this patch
Hi All,
From http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
"OpenWrt became the first distribution to pick up ath9k and contribute
to it".
But i can't see any ath9k option when doing 'make menuconfig'. Is this
because ath9k still considered unstable ?
Best Regards,
Iwan Budi Kusnanto
___
Hi
there are two fixes for the init system that are still wrong/missing...
umount -a -r -l is no good idea
just use umount -a -r
and portmap keeps a look ..
so it needs to be stopped to..
patches attached
greets
diff --git a/package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/umount b/package/base-files/f
The swap parts should be part of base files. The needed swapon/off could
come from util-linux or busybox.
.. ede
On 07.02.2010 07:00, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> This time with the patch
>
> On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 00:58 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is the automount patch I'v
This is kind of difficult as the internal flashes are usually very
small. A dd read write of 2MB is not really a test. But generally I
guess the probably very little speed difference is worth the space
saved. I guess it is little because there is no optimization switch for
speed.
ede
On 07.02.201
How will this affect performance (the opposite side of compression)?
If it does, then it would be great if this would be selectable and not
hardcoded.
Just my two cents
Maddes
On 07.02.2010 17:44, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> I discovered a currently not used option of jffs2. It allows the settin
I discovered a currently not used option of jffs2. It allows the setting
of a compression mode. Because size matters on embedded devices I wonder
why this is not enabled. Attached a patch that does that. I tried it and
it works.
More info on the available switches also here
http://mhonarc.axis.se/
What do you think of packaging hotplug automount separately? Now that
it's that sophisticated it takes several kilobytes of space. Space that
is valuable to users without non-usb-routers.
We could start a 'Base System / Hotplug Scripts' submuenu. A perfect
place also for the wifi toggle script, if
2010/2/7 :
> On 07.02.2010 08:38, Damian Lesiuk wrote:
>> I think something is wrong with usb-storage kernel driver on wl-500g premium
>> v1.
>
> brcm-2.4?
>
brcm47xx
>> When I am copying something between partition I have 100 kB/s - 300
>> kB/s, the same action on wl500g.googlecode.com firmwar
At a quick glance it looks promising. I understand the need of the
copyright notice. I am no core developer but I guess you would have to
license the files under GPL2 by adding the appropriate notice.
Any file including existing GPL2 code would have to be licensed GPL2 anyway.
Will try it out thes
When performing sysupgrade process, opkg should report its conffiles
list.
Signed-off-by: Alexey I. Froloff
---
package/opkg/Makefile|2 ++
package/opkg/files/opkg-conffiles.sh |9 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 package/opk
On 07.02.2010 08:38, Damian Lesiuk wrote:
> I think something is wrong with usb-storage kernel driver on wl-500g premium
> v1.
brcm-2.4?
> When I am copying something between partition I have 100 kB/s - 300
> kB/s, the same action on wl500g.googlecode.com firmware, I have 10
> mB/s.
> In additio
Hello,
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:51:51PM +0100, lilian bonnafoux wrote:
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6652
(Please do not apply the patch as-is: configuration files and scripts
need to be changed as well to get ahcp working out-of-the-box on
OpenWRT.)
I'm the new maintainer for the babel and
15 matches
Mail list logo
