> I've committed this. Is there a Trac# for this? I didn't close it if
> there is. I thought of this after committing, but should it perhaps not
> be in base? How many other packages depend on it? I'll fix it to be in
> libs if it's not a hard requirement for most packages.
FYI, I've changed
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 19:08 +0200, Zintis wrote:
> Just a reminder of this patch. I haven't seen it committed yet.
> OpenWRT has glibc support but for samba3 (and probably other packages) to
> work it needs gconv support. This patch adds gconv-modules package
I've committed this. Is there a Trac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
can a developer commit this patches? jow, florian, anyone?
This will help the people on the forum to easily test new snapshot
builds, as it is much easier with sysupgrade.
Maddes
On 14.01.2010 08:58, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
> Sysupgra
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6442
Please note I believe this ticket has been overlooked, with the recent
milestone release and all going on, and it had been tagged for the
completed milestone but wasn't applied as I needed to repair the patch.
I have reminded/pinged a couple times, and would not
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:28:04 +0100
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: lacie-...@sequanux.org, Gerlando Falauto
>
> It could be part of the effort of the project lacie-nas.org. If you plan to do
> some documentation, I think you should use the wiki of
> From: Jose Vasconcellos
> To: OpenWrt Development List
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] support for Lacie devices (e.g.
> edmini_v2)
>
> Hi Gerlando,
>
> I have one of these devices and every once in a while when it crashes
> I think I should put OpenWrt on it! Just haven't had the time.
This is my last forward.
Please stop crosspost.
For those who are interested, the archives of the lacie-nas mailing list are
available at:
http://sequanux.org/pipermail/lacie-nas
--- FORWARDED
From: Chris Moore
Hi Gerlando,
I didn't receive
Just a reminder of this patch. I haven't seen it committed yet.
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org
[mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Zintis
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 12:13 PM
To: 'OpenWrt Development List'
Subject: [Open
Just a reminder of this patch. I haven't seen it committed yet.
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org
[mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Zintis
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 12:04 PM
To: 'OpenWrt Development List'
Subject: [OpenWr
Just a reminder of this patch. I haven't seen it committed yet. Did I
not submit the patch correctly? (I followed instructions from
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches)
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Bates wrote:
> This patch adds the appropriate interrupt for slot 0 pin 1 of the Routerboard
Daniel Schmitt wrote:
hostapd doesn't continue to work after controller is restarted.
I also have the problem that the wlan0-interface shall not be upped with
"ifconfig wlan0 0.0.0.0 up" before starting hostapd, otherwise no beacons
will be send. The interface must be down before starting hostap
11 matches
Mail list logo
