Diff file is attached.
Erdem.
From: Erdem Ergen
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:12 AM
To: 'openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org'
Subject: [PATCH] Kernel is downloaded although "Advanced configuration
options (for developers) -> Use external kernel tree" is selected.
This patch fixes/prev
I am still waiting any response. Any help regarding this is appreciated.
Tathagata
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Tathagata Das wrote:
> Hi All,
> I want to port WNR3500L onto Kamikaze-8.09.1 with kernel-2.6.25 which has
> ssb driver. But in WNR3500L, ssb has been changes. So to port WNR3500L
On 2009-12-11 5:04 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>> I took care of that now for the shorewall patches and fixed
>> some minor compile errors in there.
> Yeah. I guess I don't have a non-GNU system to have weeded those out.
> Sorry.
No problem. It might have been broken before your changes already,
I
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 03:10 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Sorry for the delay,
No worries. I understand busy. I was trying to be patient but that
only lasted until I saw other commits. :-/
> I took care of that now for the shorewall patches and fixed
> some minor compile errors in there.
Yea
On 2009-12-11 1:52 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Is there any reason in particular that my patches to this list are being
> ignored? I thought it was everyone's but I saw some commits today, yet
> not my patches which were sent here prior the patches that were
> committed today.
>
> This seems to
Is there any reason in particular that my patches to this list are being
ignored? I thought it was everyone's but I saw some commits today, yet
not my patches which were sent here prior the patches that were
committed today.
This seems to be my (and others from messages I have seen posted here in
On 2009-12-10 11:12 PM, Erdem Ergen wrote:
>
> This patch fixes/prevents unnecessary download of Linux kernel if
> "Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel
> tree" is selected.
>
> As you know, there is an option "Advanced configuration options (for
> developers) -
This patch fixes/prevents unnecessary download of Linux kernel if
"Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Use external kernel
tree" is selected.
As you know, there is an option "Advanced configuration options (for
developers) -> Use external kernel tree", and if we select and type t
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Adrian Terranova wrote:
> I don't see any reason why it couldn't just be another build target -
> I can futz with it when I get time. You can also just use the binaries
> from the x86 image like this.
(sorry - meant to nip as portion of my writeup.)
[snip]
I don't see any reason why it couldn't just be another build target -
I can futz with it when I get time. You can also just use the binaries
from the x86 image like this.
Where is the makefile for the binaries / packges? ( I can poke thru.)
if you need a specific example install clownix - but I i
> very interesting!
> The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
> http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
Massimo there is a little wrong detail on the web site.
I did not use only the OpenWRT kernel. I used both OpenWRT kernel AND
filesystem ! :)
Saverio
__
> very interesting!
> The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
> http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
thanks ! :)
> About the tap, host-side setup is performed by the
> $NETKIT_HOME/bin/manage_tuntap script, and this is almost all that is
> required to get it running
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Benjamin Henrion [10.12.2009 14:30]:
>>
>> It is a pain to have to setup its own webserver if you want to install
>> packages for openwrt-uml.
>
> Just run 'httpd -h /mydir' and place your packages there.
> It's not openWRT's fault, that
>> Are there any other uml openwrt users out there? What are you doing
>> with the new uml releases (aside from developing openwrt?)
Hello,
sorry if you receive this email twice because you are in both mailing lists.
I successfully compiled a OpenWRT UML Image and used it in the Netkit [0]
I go
* Benjamin Henrion [10.12.2009 14:30]:
>
> It is a pain to have to setup its own webserver if you want to install
> packages for openwrt-uml.
Just run 'httpd -h /mydir' and place your packages there.
It's not openWRT's fault, that your windows does not have a simple httpd.
bye, Bastian.
signa
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
>
> Le mardi 8 décembre 2009 01:52:52, Adrian Terranova a écrit :
>> Hi, (this is a repost post from openwrt-users which got no reply :( )
>>
>> could someone share the tell me the genealogy / plans for the openwrt
>> uml por
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey.
> well, it wouldn't hurt and maybe somebody might need it in the
> future.
Exactly.
> But, I have problems to figure out where the scripts gets the network
> values from. It's not in the general nvram vars available by 'uci
> show'.
Most of th
well, it wouldn't hurt and maybe somebody might need it in the future.
Also maybe some other variables for wireless and the like. But, I have
problems to figure out where the scripts gets the network values from.
It's not in the general nvram vars available by 'uci show'.
... ede
On 09.12.200
Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2009-12-08 1:36 PM, Ugur DOGRU wrote:
Hi,
After getting busybox 1.15.2, "local" macro is not a problem now. So I
removed all modifications that removes local.
To remind it, these changes are for ubicom32 platform, but for all
no-mmu platforms in general.
As ash can
19 matches
Mail list logo
