Hi,
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I wonder what the feasibility is of instead of putting a linux kernel in
> the kernel portion of the flash image and essentially what's an initrd
> in the filesystem portion (because remember, all the / in the flash
> image does for me is mount USB storage on /), putt
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:46:10PM +0100, Steven Barth wrote:
> Why emulate a 1 dimensional limited configuration system for all platforms,
> with a maximum capacity of 32kiB just because ONLY some old broadcom based
> routers use it?
Right.
NVRAM was usually a 32k block of consecutive name=val
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4432
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
chaostables are obsolete for some time now as they have been merged into
xtables-addons
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4431
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=484856
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis
--- linux-2.6.28.1/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_fs.c.orig2009-01-22 23:47:36.0
+0200
+++ linux-2.6.28.1/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_fs.c 2009-01-22 23:48:20.0 +0200
@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@
pgoff_t index = p
> I disagree because that would create an unwanted relationship between
> ipkg and sysupgrade and also will result in having old configuration
> files if new versions of packages also have updated
> configuration files.
Why would you not want such a relationship. [io]pkg's conffiles are
meant to
http://acassis.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/erro-compilando-kernel-2622-no-opensuse11-gcc-431
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis
--- linux-2.6.23.17/include/linux/time.h.orig 2009-01-22
23:18:04.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.23.17/include/linux/time.h2009-01-22
23:25:17.0 +02
> > thats why UCI was invented
>
> I would have suggested some kind of "on disk" nvram emulation for such
> non-nvram capable systems so that the nvram paradigm remains the same
> for nvram capable systems and is emulated for others that have, say,
> persistent disk.
Why emulate a 1 dimensional lim
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 09:39 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>
> only very few computersystems have NVRAM
s/computersystems/[wireless] routers/ ? OpenWRT is targeted at
[wireless] routers.
> thats why UCI was invented
I would have suggested some kind of "on disk" nvram emulation for such
non-nvra
greets puchu
Index: feeds/packages/net/shorewall-common/Makefile
===
--- feeds/packages/net/shorewall-common/Makefile(Revision 14144)
+++ feeds/packages/net/shorewa
http://www.mail-archive.com/ucl...@uclibc.org/msg02985.html
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis
--- htpdate-1.0.4/htpdate.c.orig2009-01-22 11:20:54.0 +0200
+++ htpdate-1.0.4/htpdate.c 2009-01-22 11:18:55.0 +0200
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@
/* Read current kernel
* Brian J. Murrell [21.01.2009 16:15]:
> On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:41 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> >
> > KISS!
>
> Heh. KISS would have been leaving the config in the NVRAM as it was
> intended. :-)
only very few computersystems have NVRAM - thats why UCI was invented
> Maybe the list of c
12 matches
Mail list logo
