Hi Brian ;-)
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Please excuse the cross-posting but this thread started on openwrt-users
> but the findings are probably more relevant to the developers.
>
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 17:46 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>> Lookup b43_interrupt_handler() and look for the "reason
Please excuse the cross-posting but this thread started on openwrt-users
but the findings are probably more relevant to the developers.
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 17:46 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> Lookup b43_interrupt_handler() and look for the "reason" variable.
> Fairly straightforward, IMO.
O
Hi all,
I want to know whether our openwrt support brcm4718 or any work
had been done for it.
especially, i2c and usb .
Thanks,
Steven
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 22:20:07 Antti Seppälä wrote:
> +static void vlynq_reset(struct vlynq_device *dev)
> +{
> + vlynq_reg_write(dev->local->control,
> + vlynq_reg_read(dev->local->control) |
> + VLYNQ_CTRL_RESET);
> +
> + /* Wait for t
Hello.
I recently came across an ar7 device which has the vlynq hardwired
so that the clocks are always generated by the remote device
instead of the local one.
Upon initialization the current version of vlynq driver disables
remote clock generation and causes the entire bus to hang on my
device.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:53:13AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:06 +0100, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
> >
> > thanks for reporting on mailing list! I never read forums ...
me neither
>
>
> Me neither. In contrast to e-mail, they are an asinine way to
> communic
> We decided to maintain packages outside of the release cycle, so that
> people always get the latest package updates, even when using the
> release branch.
Let me tell you this story first :)
At Ninux.org we tried to mantain a meta-package of OpenWRT, that was
supposed to configure the router to
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:24 +0100, Gregers Petersen wrote:
>> I believe it is appropriate to mention that the developer-group as a
>> whole has been, and is, very hard working and in lack of adequate time -
>> unfortunately this makes "slips-of-the-mind" possible, and I ca
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:24 +0100, Gregers Petersen wrote:
> I believe it is appropriate to mention that the developer-group as a
> whole has been, and is, very hard working and in lack of adequate time -
> unfortunately this makes "slips-of-the-mind" possible, and I can only
> make a note in this
ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
>>> *** there is also a 8.09 tag of the packages folder ?? ***
>>> I think this is _VERY_ important!
>> We decided to not tag packages for 8.09 until we introduce build
>> system related API changes, so that 8.09 users can keep updating
>> their packages.
>> The fee
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:06 +0100, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
>
> thanks for reporting on mailing list! I never read forums ...
Me neither. In contrast to e-mail, they are an asinine way to
communicate. Having to "poll" (i,e, go to a webpage and check to see if
there are any replies to yo
>> *** there is also a 8.09 tag of the packages folder ?? ***
>> I think this is _VERY_ important!
> We decided to not tag packages for 8.09 until we introduce build
> system related API changes, so that 8.09 users can keep updating
> their packages.
> The feeds.conf.default was set up in a way th
ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
>> I'm wondering why the 8.09 RC1 announcement was not made here. It was
>> made on the "forums" at
> [..CUT..]
>
> thanks for reporting on mailing list! I never read forums ...
It was announced on the front page, but yes, you're right - I should
have announced it
I believe it is appropriate to mention that the developer-group as a
whole has been, and is, very hard working and in lack of adequate time -
unfortunately this makes "slips-of-the-mind" possible, and I can only
make a note in this regard.
But, officially RC1 of the up-coming release is public.
C
> I'm wondering why the 8.09 RC1 announcement was not made here. It was
> made on the "forums" at
[..CUT..]
thanks for reporting on mailing list! I never read forums ...
maybe is time also to update the wiki/trac main page:
https://dev.openwrt.org/
*** there is also a 8.09 tag of the packages
15 matches
Mail list logo
