Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] About patches turn

Quoting Gary Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > > > I am a newbie for openwrt. I am puzzled about patches. > > Generally, In the patch directory, there r several patches like > 001-XXX.patch and 002-XXX.patch etc. > > I want to know, when compile, what about the turn of patching to the source > cod

[OpenWrt-Devel] About patches turn

Hi, I am a newbie for openwrt. I am puzzled about patches. Generally, In the patch directory, there r several patches like 001-XXX.patch and 002-XXX.patch etc. I want to know, when compile, what about the turn of patching to the source code? Does it patch according to the NO. ? 001, 002...

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] pppd uses the local ipv6 address as the default route

applied, thanks Quoting Alina Friedrichsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The remote address is $5 and not $4. > > /ppp-2.4.3/scripts/ipv6-up.sample >> # This script is called with the following parameters: # interface >> tty speed local-address remote-address ipparam > > Signed-off-by: Alina Friedrich

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Update dovecot to 1.1.2 (resubmit)

Hello again, Sorry for previous mangled line wrapping (this is my first patch submission). Here is another try! The patch is also attached to ticket #3785. --- Regarding https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3785 I've been running dovecot 1.1.1 on my WL-500P (brcm-47xx) for a week a

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Update dovecot to 1.1.2

Hello, Regarding https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/3785 I've been running dovecot 1.1.1 on my WL-500P (brcm-47xx) for a week and recently updated to 1.1.2 and cleaned up the patches, see attached dovecot-1.1.2.svn.patch The updated configure.in.patch was inspired by optware and fu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Etrax support

You suspicious are right: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]# ./boot_linux -F -d eth0 -i owrt.zImage Using internal boot loader: INTERNAL_NW - Network boot (default). Starting boot... We're doing a flash write, this may take up to a few minutes... Device ID = 0xb7f7 This bootloader was built by root

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] pppd uses the local ipv6 address as the default route

The remote address is $5 and not $4. /ppp-2.4.3/scripts/ipv6-up.sample # This script is called with the following parameters: # interface tty speed local-address remote-address ipparam Signed-off-by: Alina Friedrichsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: package/ppp/files/etc/ppp/ipv6-up =

[OpenWrt-Devel] Speaker on RB133 board

If anyone is really missing a driver for onboard speaker on RB133, here is an ugly hack that uses it from userspace: http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~zajio1am/software/wmon/ -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Etrax support

Hinko Kocevar wrote: > > I'll give it a try. Kamikaze image produces the same result for me here. Up until now I never used kamikaze image(s) on my hardware :( and wasn't aware of the problem. I've mainly used owrt for toolchain generating. I found out that owrt somehow mangles kernel image w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Multiple sources for madwifi

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:43:38AM +0200, Roberto Riggio wrote: > This patch allows the user to select the version > of madwifi to be built. At the moment the following > sources are supported: > > - Use subversion revision 3314 > - Use subversion revision 3776 > - Use stable release version 0.9

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Etrax support

MichelinoK wrote: > Big-Cut :) > > >> Both outputs look sane - could you please post the output of these two >> commands as well: >> 2. ./boot_linux -F -d eth0 -i openwrt-etrax-jffs2-64k-fimage -p > > The output is this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]# ./boot_linux -F -d eth0 -i > kamikaze/tr