> "Staněk" == Staněk Luboš (lubek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Staněk> The last SVN (r22319) code is broken the other way round. It
Staněk> compares up to the username's length of Htaccess entry. It
Staněk> relates to a hack to authenticate against a usernameless
Staněk> Htaccess entry.
Y
Hi,
I have telnetd setup to get started through the init
scripts, but when I connect, Cntl-C won't kill a hung
process. If I kill and restart telnetd (from the
console) then Cntl-C works OK from the telnet session.
It seems as though process control is not available
when started through the init
Sorry, I didn't mean to offend or insult you and the other developers.
I realize you all have lives and are busy, and I sincerely appreciate
the time and effort you have all spent in developing OpenWRT. It's
just a bit frustrating to submit a patch and get no response, only to
see the ident
Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Why should wpa_supplicant get started for unencrypted networks?
Oops, my mail client didn't show the replies when I hit 'send', but I still
have some further questions:
Pedro Bandim Faustino wrote:
> The european eduroam network (802.1x) is in place in various countries
> b
Pedro Bandim Faustino wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Faustino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why should wpa_supplicant get started for unencrypted networks?
- Felix
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailm
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:18 -0500
> From: "Travis Kemen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] madwifi.sh doesn't take into
>account association with unencrypted networks
> To: "OpenWrt Development List"
> Message-ID:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type:
for the roaming features i guess ?
Travis Kemen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Pedro Bandim Faustino
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Pedro Faustino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Index: package/madwifi/files/lib/wifi/madwifi.sh
>> ==
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Pedro Bandim Faustino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Faustino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> Index: package/madwifi/files/lib/wifi/madwifi.sh
> ===
> --- package/madwifi/files/lib/wi
1.
Just wondering if my proposals to madwifi.sh are seen as useful by the
developpers.
When no one replies does it mean "will be committed when we feel like" or ...?
2.
I've successfully compiled ppp 2.4.4 but with far less patches than
trunk's version has (e.g. replacedefaultroute won't work). Wo
Peter Korsgaard napsal(a):
>> "Staněk" == Staněk Luboš (lubek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Staněk> Require the username for password protected paths in busybox's httpd.
> Staněk> The bug is present in all busybox releases up to trunk.
>
> That breaks setups with empty username (/path::p
> picking my nose, waiting on a patch from you, so i can ignore it and
> then get back to picking my nose.
I doubt any of we who have submitted ignored updates feel that way,
and I'm sorry you think we do. The question I have is whether you
core devs would prefer patches submitted in a different
Ciao again,
On ven, 2008-06-13 at 11:22 +0200, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> Ciao,
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/mnt/devel/openwrt/OpenWRT.git/build_dir/toolchain-m68k_gcc4.3.1/uClibc-0.9.29'
> install -d
> /mnt/devel/openwrt/OpenWRT.git/staging_dir/toolchain-m68k_gcc4.3.1//lib
> insta
we all have real life jobs. look at the timeline in trac and you will
see, that patches, addons and new features are constantly being added.
you are definatley not wasting your time. just be patient, we are only
humans. each and every one of the devs invests a lot of time to develop
a great dis
I submitted the identical patch back on May 26, and it was ignored.
Am I just wasting my time sending in patches?
On Jun 11, 2008, at 1:03 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> applied, but forgot the signed off in the commit msg, sorry
>
> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>> I'd like to propose the following pat
Ciao,
in order to advance the building I manually created the following link:
cd
staging_dir/toolchain-m68k_gcc4.3.1/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-uclibc/4.3.1/include
ln -s ../include-fixed/limits.h .
In your opinion... can it be a solution?
with this workaround the uClibc compilation advances untile t
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> I'm still working to port OpenWRT on my architecture (m68k/coldfire). I
> diff --git a/target/linux/generic_m68k/config-default
> b/target/linux/generic_m68k/config-default
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..6f8acb5
> --- /dev/null
> +++
16 matches
Mail list logo
