Martin Metzker wrote:
> Ok, and why do I have to add that big part starting with " The software in
> this package falls into several categories"? The apache Makefile for example
> doesn't contain any note about apache being distributed under a different
> licence that GPLv2. Why is it ok with Ap
Ok, and why do I have to add that big part starting with " The software in this
package falls into several categories"? The apache Makefile for example doesn't
contain any note about apache being distributed under a different licence that
GPLv2. Why is it ok with Apache but not with EsounD?
Mar
Il Tuesday 12 February 2008 11:33:54 hai scritto:
> I'm having this issue with the access point I mentioned in the subject.
> Here it is the bootlog:
>
I noticed I forgot to paste all the logs...
This access point was working well with a kernel a little older (the kernel in
cvs some weeks ago).
T
I'm having this issue with the access point I mentioned in the subject. Here
it is the bootlog:
PCI: IXP4xx is host
PCI: IXP4xx Using direct access for memory space
PCI: bus0: Fast back to back transfers enabled
dmabounce: registered device :00:01.0 on pci bus
dmabounce: registered device 000
